Audizine - An Automotive Enthusiast Community

Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    Senior Member Two Rings
    Join Date
    Jan 13 2021
    AZ Member #
    581924
    Location
    Virginia

    PCV valve and oil cap vacuum

    Guest-only advertisement. Register or Log In now!
    Hi all,

    My s4 has mostly sat in limbo for the last year or so while ive tried to figure out if i would sell it or not this spring. I have mostly decided to keep it. I drove it for the first time in a while tonight came home thought i heard whistling, but didnt. It got me thinking about the PCV. I pulled my dipstick and could hear air sucking in. same thing (to a lesser extent) for the Oil cap. I recall that this is a sign of a failing pcv. So the question is, how much vacuum is too much and a sign that i need a new PCV? I dont really drive the car that much so monitoring oil consumption may not be the best trick. Or maybe i just have plenty of time.

    Car is e40 dual pulley so when i do drive it, Im not exactly gentle.

  2. #2
    Veteran Member Four Rings
    Join Date
    Jul 16 2018
    AZ Member #
    422473
    Location
    Atlanta

    You don't say what engine code or what model year you have.

    The B8.0 3.0T crankcase vacuum at idle, set by the PCV unit, was 30 mbar originally and then 150 mbar revised. If you are 8K0907551 A or B, you should be running the 30 mbar unit. If you are 8K0907551 D 0003 or later, you should be running the 150 mbar unit.

    B8.5 3.0T had the 150 mbar PCV from the start.
    2009 A4 Avant 2.0T quattro Prestige, 275k miles

  3. #3
    Senior Member Two Rings
    Join Date
    Jan 13 2021
    AZ Member #
    581924
    Location
    Virginia

    Quote Originally Posted by Smac770 View Post
    You don't say what engine code or what model year you have.

    The B8.0 3.0T crankcase vacuum at idle, set by the PCV unit, was 30 mbar originally and then 150 mbar revised. If you are 8K0907551 A or B, you should be running the 30 mbar unit. If you are 8K0907551 D 0003 or later, you should be running the 150 mbar unit.

    B8.5 3.0T had the 150 mbar PCV from the start.
    I have a 14 b8.5, so it should be the later revision are those values i should be measuring? My understanding was that if i hear air sucking, the valve might be bad.

  4. #4
    Veteran Member Four Rings
    Join Date
    Mar 31 2008
    AZ Member #
    27118
    My Garage
    eS-4
    Location
    CAL*SO

    Quote Originally Posted by Smac770 View Post
    You don't say what engine code or what model year you have.

    The B8.0 3.0T crankcase vacuum at idle, set by the PCV unit, was 30 mbar originally and then 150 mbar revised. If you are 8K0907551 A or B, you should be running the 30 mbar unit. If you are 8K0907551 D 0003 or later, you should be running the 150 mbar unit.

    B8.5 3.0T had the 150 mbar PCV from the start.
    Hey I sent you a pm the other day..
    If I'm running 003 software and I'm pretty sure the earlier version PCv. So I should change huh?
    The same throttle body and corn toon as everyone else.
    A ported blower and the mega bitch pulley.
    Lots of water and wheels lighter than my bank account.

  5. #5
    Active Member Four Rings SwankPeRFection's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 05 2013
    AZ Member #
    120364
    Location
    N/A

    Quote Originally Posted by 04lss View Post
    I have a 14 b8.5, so it should be the later revision are those values i should be measuring? My understanding was that if i hear air sucking, the valve might be bad.
    There will always be vacuum on the dipstick tube and on the oil cap. You don’t want positive pressure in there.

  6. #6
    Veteran Member Four Rings
    Join Date
    Jul 16 2018
    AZ Member #
    422473
    Location
    Atlanta

    Quote Originally Posted by 04lss View Post
    I have a 14 b8.5, so it should be the later revision are those values i should be measuring? My understanding was that if i hear air sucking, the valve might be bad.
    Put a vacuum gauge on the dipstick tube, idling it should show ~150 mbar (4.4 inHg). If it's more than that, the PCV regulator valve is likely torn and allowing too much vacuum past. This risks the various seals on the engine. If it's less than that, meh, could be whatever. But you should not see it positive pressure (get a mixed pressure/vacuum gauge if looking to confirm that), except maybe just barely and just briefly at WOT.

    I don't think an unmetered air leak is going to be as much a problem on a 3.0T as the 2.0T because the 3.0T is MAP driven rather than MAF driven. One guy didn't even have the breather line from the crankcase to the air intake path connected, just hanging there. So if you're hearing what you believe to be errant noise, you need to figure out what that actually is first. Not sure you can presume anything until the specific manner of noise is determined.
    2009 A4 Avant 2.0T quattro Prestige, 275k miles

  7. #7
    Veteran Member Four Rings
    Join Date
    Jul 16 2018
    AZ Member #
    422473
    Location
    Atlanta

    Quote Originally Posted by Fresh.S4 View Post
    Hey I sent you a pm the other day..
    If I'm running 003 software and I'm pretty sure the earlier version PCv. So I should change huh?
    Aye, it's "in the stack". According to the TSB https://static.nhtsa.gov/odi/tsbs/20...81642-0699.pdf if you're rev D and version 0003 or later, the ECM software is expecting 150 mbar.
    C > F > Q > AC is the 30 mbar line
    H > S > AB > AH is the 150 mbar line
    For some reason, I recall there being more to this; it's probably in some thread some some time back here in this forum somewhere.

    There's also the regulator diaphragm repair kits from Audi. That's nice of them.
    06E103772G - not sure the application, is this for H and S, or for AC?
    06E103772H - for AB and AH

    Technically, the vacuum level is set by the spring and diaphragm, so I wonder if you could just use a 772H on a 547AC and effectively get a 547AH.
    2009 A4 Avant 2.0T quattro Prestige, 275k miles

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  


    © 2001-2025 Audizine, Audizine.com, and Driverzines.com
    Audizine is an independently owned and operated automotive enthusiast community and news website.
    Audi and the Audi logo(s) are copyright/trademark Audi AG. Audizine is not endorsed by or affiliated with Audi AG.