I don’t know of a good split boot for quick repairs on the inners. The inner joints have a weird body to them that is hard to seal even with the correct boot. The OEM grease for the inners appears to be non molly and quite thin. The reasoning Audi gave is that it lowers friction to reduce the chance of shudder. The compromise is that molly is better for wear under high loading but theoretically may interfere with the fine needle bearings used on the inners, causing them to slide and not roll.
Also it interesting to note that roller wheel bearings use a moly based lube ( NLGI GC-LB). U joints in old school drive shafts? They have the same moly non molly debate. Turns out most joints with needle bearings have been getting lubes with a percentage of moly. Some literature suggests that moly not be used in high speed needle bearings that undergo a full rotation. That same literature says that CV bearings only oscillate back and forth, for those applications moly is recommended since it has improved impact performance. The correct answer seems to be is not just molly or no molly, its the percentage and how heavy the carrier grease is.
https://www.machinerylubrication.com...20CV%20joints.
GKN the OEM manufacturer has app notes that says no molly on the inners that are tripods but ships its inner kits with a moly based lube. They even have a special inner tripod joint grease that they don't ship with their inner kits, so it’s not like they don’t have it. Super confusing.
It possible that in the 20+ years since our cars were made the moly based lubes have been refined and can work in either joint or that the skidding roller issue is not an issue? It's hard to say. My personal experience is that in five years 45,000 miles the moly based lube that came with my GKN boot kit on the inners has not been an issue. That’s 300 WHP, 8000 miles a year.
I have seen one complaint about the moly lube not working on the inners. It's hard to know for sure since there are a lot of other factors that can cause an issue. That includes contamination, condition of the joint prior to relubing it and possible damage from the repair. Determining cause and effect on a sample of one is at best a guess.
If you have a known good joint that you just want to freshen with a new boot my recommendation is to not take it apart. If the boot is torn its a judgment call if the joint has been contaminated and need to be inspected for damage.
That bring me to my next point. In my experience the best way to handle a roller type bearing is to avoid any sharp blows to it. Impacts can cause damage and lead to failure. Disassembly and reassembly leads to the chance of mixing up what parts were running together. In a perfect world you don't have to hammer the inner off and you put the rollers in the same joint with the same roller in the same slot.
My personal preference is if the inner joint has not been contaminated and I'm doing both boots is to not disturb the joint and just put in new lube put a fresh boot on, that keeps the parts that have been running together in the same location. The old lube is easy to get out and a bit for mineral spirits removes all residue. I refill the joint with fresh lube, work it back and forth a bit and put a new boot on. A good crimp tool and OEM type clamps reduce the change of seepage.
Short story? The OEM lube is not supplied with most inner kits, you need to look for it. I have 5 years and 45,000 miles on the GKN kit using the supplied moly based lube without issue. We have had some pretty extreme weather, cold and hot. My only gripe with the GKN kit was getting the inner clamps to not seep grease, an upgraded crimp tool helped. The OEM kit appears to have better crimp bands but is a lot more expensive. The better crimp tool was a nice addition to the tool box. Some non GKN greases may be an issue?
I have a couple of OEM kits for the next refresh and will swap over (I have a stash of OEM boot kits and new GKN outer joints in my spares cabinets and two good front axle assemblies).
Bookmarks