Hi guys, I am looking for advice on which tune to choose, ideally from people who have used both and can compare. I have no prior experience with tuning. My car is a 2013 A6 C7 3.0T and basically stock. The only upgrade I have done to it is adding a 12.3 inch RSNAV S4 display to it. It has 55k miles and I’ve had it for 8 years. I am not an aggressive driver, and I have always felt that the car has plenty of power for my driving style, but i guess i have had it for too long now so I am starting to get bored and looking to spice it up a bit. I don’t push it hard or launch it, but i really enjoy powerful low RPM torque up to 3,000-3,500 RPM, which RPM band my car spends 99% of the time in. Looking at the dyno charts on their websites, it looks like IE has more aggressive torque figures in the lower RPM range, which would be more beneficial for my driving style. Those of you who have tried both, is that your observation in real life that IE has more low end torque?
I watched this guy’s video (https://youtu.be/1LEajEGRhNU) and others, he seems pretty knowledgeable and was speaking very highly of 034 and how they can actually re-program torque limit tables similar to a factory ECU tune instead of using work-arounds that other tuners he says use. He basically suggests that their tune is very competently done and better than the competition. Do you know if IE’s tune torque limits are similarly coded? He says that he is very familiar with IE, and he didn’t talk about them specifically and only referred to “competitors” but i would conclude from his statements that IE don’t have that level of programming refinement. I don’t know if that’s true or not. He also says the 034’s throttle mapping percentages would correspond very accurately to the level of pedal press, for example a 64% press would give you 64% open throttle. Is that throttle mapping valid for a stage 1 tune or is it done with a stage 2 tune? I wonder what IE’s throttle mapping looks like with stage 1.
On their website, IE advertise how they keep lower exhaust temperatures to protect the fragile cats these cars use and 034 doesn’t speak to that. Is there more of a risk of cat issues down the line with 034?
In normal driving in D mode, do both tunes behave similarly in terms of maintaining RPMs like stock? I don’t want the car to feel aggressive unless i ask for it. The stock TCU loves to keep RPMs around 1,300-1,500 for normal driving, which i like and i hope the tuned TCU would keep the transmission’s behavior similar unless I am in S mode.
I intend to only do the software upgrade unless I have to change hardware since i don’t push my car hard. I don’t see myself ever pushing it to 7,200 RPM so would i be fine and not run into overheating issues without adding a better heat exchanger and not sacrifice the car’s durability?
IE has the app to show me IAT and other parameters, which is a plus to determine if my car is running hot. So, honestly i can’d decide between the 2.
Thank you all!
Bookmarks