
Originally Posted by
bmwpower603
It is NOT normal for a manufacturer to stop making parts at the rate that Audi is for the B5 S4... (Which is in my top 5 favorite vehicles of all time) It is still way to early in my opinion to stop making some of the parts ive seen wither away.
Oh my top five
1. Ferrari F430
2. E60 M5
3. Porsche 911 S
4. B5 S4 / E36 M3 (tie)
5. E46 M3
How long is 'normal' in your opinion for mass-produced vehicles to start to discontinue factory parts?
25 years seems like a reasonable amount of time for the 'normal' consumer automotive parts life cycle to complete. The automotive model life cycle in down to 6 yrs currently?
Automotive makers have less time to recoup development costs today than ever before. The pressure is on consumers purchase a newer model as quickly as possible to accelerate the product cycle. Which will also accelerate the end of factory support the previous model, correct?
In fact, It might even be true that automakers
loose money the longer they maintain legacy production related operations, factories, tooling, workers and other overhead related to producing unprofitable legacy parts and products.
That is excluding 'boutique' brands like Porsche or Ferrari. It's unfair to compare those makers to more mass production makers.
Should Audi keep making factory parts for 35, 40 years after the last car rolls off? Forever..?
Investors want to see return on development investment, and not continuing parts production for 25+ yr old models.
Parts forever would be wonderful the hobbyists but also a very poor way to run an aggressive forward-looking business.
Audi Tradition could make parts forever and offer them at a price to sustain that business division.
That would just be a 'nice thing to do' for a few unprofitable consumers.
(Edited for grammar/ wording)
Bookmarks