
Originally Posted by
CHASEG
Hi guys,
Having a hard time deciding between graphene or ceramic coating. My detailer has given me the option of either ArtdeShine graphene or Ceramic Pro. My previous car was ceramic coated and I thought it was really great. I have tried researching the subject but most of the information is confounding. Let me know if you guys have any information or opinions on the two.
I’ll start with I detail cars as a second job and have done work with ceramic coatings. That said from what I have read and what other detailers I work with in my area have experienced is that the current graphene coatings are more of a gimmick. For the most part they contain ceramic coating and add in a small amount of graphene. You get very minor benefit from the graphene oxide. Using a topper over the ceramic which most shops do now anyway have similar affects. As graphene progress in the automotive space you will see more pure graphene coating which will be a game changer. I haven’t specifically worked with artdeshine, so can’t speak to their graphene levels and durability other than their site shows hydrophobic properties are only 2 years on the pro coating. I can say ceramic pro has been around for a long time and has evolved to be a really good coating. Graphene in the automotive space is just too new for me to recommend to customer as of yet, but I see it’s potential. If you like being on the cutting edge try it and let us know how you like it. The more first hand info we get the better. I know my first ceramic coating sucked compared to the latest ones; like a fine wine these things get better with time.
Sent from my iPhone using
Audizine Forum
Bookmarks