Audizine - An Automotive Enthusiast Community

Page 1 of 6 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 40 of 201
  1. #1
    Veteran Member Three Rings Jeff_Jeske's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 24 2018
    AZ Member #
    431770
    Location
    Madison WI

    Coilovers - Camber Plates - Travel Bump/Droop - My Lessons Learned

    Guest-only advertisement. Register or Log In now!
    UPDATED 4/22/2021

    I'm simply sharing some information that I've gathered on my journey to having a proper compliant dual purpose coilover suspension. I think the best way to kick this off is to list some of the things that I found to be unexpected.

    1. The TTRS and RS3 do not have the same length front magride shocks from the factory. The TTRS shocks are about .65" shorter than the RS3. This won't matter when it comes to simply replacing springs with the magride shocks, but once you move to a coilover you need to be aware that the advertised drop for a TTRS will be .65" less than that of an RS3. The lower you go the more bump travel you consume.

    2. Most available coilovers have not been tested on our platform. They are basically Golf R (MQB) coilovers that have been repurposed. Some provide different spring rates some do not.

    3. Working on this platform requires uncommon sized metric sockets and tools you may not have like a triple square.
    For example:
    a. I had to go buy a 24mm 12-point, and 13, 18, and 20 tools.
    b. Removing the front suspension on the TTRS is a real pain unless you take the plunge and remove axle bolt to remove the axle from the spindle. Then it is fairly simple the catch is that is a use once bolt it really needs to be torqued to spec when done.
    c. Something simple, like removing the wiper blades, requires extra tools such as a wiper puller. You can't just loosen a nut and lift it off by hand.

    4. Not all camber plates are the same. I have had 034, Vorshlag and GC. Each offers its own unique pros and cons. I will spell some of them out thru pictures along the way.

    5. If you plan to purchase some coilovers ask for the drawings and review measurements. If the manufacturer won't provide you with drawings at a minimum ask for the shock lengths. If you can't get those you may want to pass on them. I say this because you are going to want to know how their length compares to the OEM none lowered length. This will give you a good idea of how much travel you have to give up to achieve the ride height you want.

    6. I am currently running the Ultimate Performance JRI coilovers which are spendy but provide the best of both worlds. With a 450lb front and rear spring it can be as soft as stock or it can be ramped up for the track. I'm running 550lb x4 and they are more track orientated but still very tolerable. Knowing now what I didn't know then I would have gone with 450lb x4 and then used spring rubbers to get more spring rate on the track.

    7. If you don't NEED coilovers it might be best to just stick with springs and magride suspension. I do miss having on the fly adjustment of soft/hard settings and I dislike having to purchase expensive magride eliminator devices. Also unless you are buying something that has already been proven to work there is risk it won't provide the results you are looking for. My example would be the Ohlins and Vorshlag plate combo. That was a train wreck. By now most springs have been fully vetted yet not many coilover have been. In fact I still see people buying KW and within a year migrating to JRI.

    Some history...... What generated the lessons learned post

    I purchased the Ohlins DFV coilovers when they were first released. At that time we didn't know that the TTRS had different suspension lengths only different geometry. Before purchasing I called Ohlins and asked if these were generic MQB coilovers with different valving and springs. The answer was yes but that they would work fine. I stepped it up a notch further and asked for customer revalve of the shocks and stiffer springs. The final configuration was 10k front and 8k rear. I paired these to Vorshalg camber plates.

    Ohlins wasn't wrong ... everything bolted in perfectly but ride height was an issue. I was able to achieve the ride height I wanted but it required absolutely slamming the shocks to the lowest setting. This ended up eating most of my suspension bump travel causing the occasional bottoming out of the shock or "crashing" which is basically an abrupt stop and loud thump. If you lower your car to far on the stock shocks the same thump, bang, crash will happen. Many people blame this on the camber plates but it is in fact a lack of available bump travel due to lowering the car too much. Further research uncovered some actionable approaches to resolving the travel issue with the Ohlins.

    My Vorshlag plates are extremely well made and fairly bullet proof but they come standard with a double row bearing which eats up some travel. It would still be lower profile than using the OEM top hats but there is some travel consumed for the sake of being very heavy duty. Not an optimal solution for us.

    The Ohlins shocks rest on a hollow tube that surrounds the adjuster. This tubing also takes up usable travel. I assume its there to protect the adjuster or maintain a reasonable distance from the CV boot but there about 3/4" of travel that can be recovered there by cutting the end of the shock off. Again not optimal but some have done it.

    Vorshlag vs GC stack height



    If you want max travel at all cost the GC will provide that BUT the shock shaft will mount much higher in the strut tower. So high in fact that you will need to open up the strut tower opening to make it fit.


    Here you can see an unmodded tower and a modded one:


    If i were to use a spacer to lower the shaft then I'm again giving up the advantage of the GC plates and might as well go with something flat like 034 or Vorshlag with the single row bearing.


    Here is how the Vorshlag mounted up inside the shock tower. Plenty of room to get full negative camber. No cutting or contact of any kind.


    Also mentioned was the shortening of the shock via angle grinder. Here you'll see a typical shock bottom vs the Ohlins:


    The other thing about the TTRS is the distance between the cover and the shock tower ... and the shock tower to the hood is much tighter on the TTRS. All of these camber plates use reverse mounted bolts meaning they are pointed up and most will make contact with the cowl cover. There are also concerns about how much poke you can have from a top adjusting shock like the one pictured above. The RS3 has much more room between the hood and the tower... We do not. I would hate to go through all that trouble only to find out you may also need to modify the hood to ensure the stub doesn't come in contact with it.



    On the back things are much simpler but if the coilover comes with an 8" primary spring its probably too long for the loaded weight of the car meaning it will be hard to lower the car enough. A single primary spring will also be too short when in full droop which happens quite a bit. The best approach would be a 6-7" primary and a very light helper that fully compresses. When I tripod my rears unload and get somewhat unseated.
    Loaded


    Unloaded
    Last edited by Jeff_Jeske; 04-22-2021 at 10:26 AM.

  2. #2
    Veteran Member Three Rings Jeff_Jeske's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 24 2018
    AZ Member #
    431770
    Location
    Madison WI

    As mentioned in the initial post #7 if you just want better performance and optics I suggest you entertain sticking with springs, plates and a rear sway bar.

    I am in no way sponsored by 034 but they have produced some solid solutions and I am running some of their parts. I like that they contribute to the community thru the forum and create video content while answering customer questions.

    If you want to eliminate headaches, cost and complexity while making your car more enjoyable to drive then I suggest 034 rear sway bar, 034 lower springs, 034 camber plates. Those alone will provide a huge improvement for less than $1000.

    The 034 camber plate does solve a couple problems:

    1. They aren't domed which likely means they wont create contact with the shock tower.
    2. They don't have upwards facing bolts. They have the OEM downward facing bolts that they provide and the surfaced of all three mount points is flush with the tower unlike GC.
    3. They aren't adjustable so they won't require additional time to set camber. It also prevents those adjustment from loosening and getting out of spec.
    4. They work well with factory magride shocks and do not add NVH.
    5. They don't require shock tower modification.
    6. They appear to be a well built product.

    There are a couple suspected cons:
    1. The internal rubber puck may compress over time. I'm not sure this happens often but if it does the fix is simple it just requires re-tightening of the top nut. Worst case the puck would need to be replaced but that is unlikely.
    2. The internal rubber puck is flexible and can cause the entire center section of the shock to move up almost .5" when the shock takes a hard impact. For a street car this is likely a PRO not a CON. That movement could be considered emergency shock travel. For a serious track car this could accelerate wear and tear of the puck. There are some pictures below that show what happens when you bottom out the shock and the shaft energy forces the puck movement. This is a rare outcome likely resulting from driver error and an off track experience.

    https://store.034motorsport.com/audi/tt/ttrs/8s/2-5-tfsi/suspension-steering.html
    Last edited by Jeff_Jeske; 04-22-2021 at 11:00 AM.

  3. #3
    Veteran Member Three Rings Jeff_Jeske's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 24 2018
    AZ Member #
    431770
    Location
    Madison WI

    UPDATE 4/22/2021

    My current setup is:

    Ground Control Version 2 Camber Plates - Modified - I feel these are the best option to achieve max negative camber at this time.
    Ground Control Articulating Rear Spring Perch (great product)
    Ultimate Performance JRI 2-way coilovers with 550lb springs (450lb is likely better for DD)
    Whiteline Adjustable Endlinks (required)
    034 Rear Toe Arms (not needed)
    034 Rear Camber Arms (not needed)
    034 Subframe inserts (not needed)
    JXB Rear Trailing Arms (helpful). You could also use the 034 Trailing Arms.

    Alignment Specs:
    Front -3* Camber 0 Toe
    Rear -1.8* Camber .10 Total Toe In

    Notes:
    With spring rates higher than 450lbs I didn't find a need for upgrading the sway bars. I had installed the 034 RSB and removed it.
    The addition of the Wavetrac was a keystone performance part that completed the transformation of the platform.
    Last edited by Jeff_Jeske; 04-22-2021 at 11:02 AM.

  4. #4
    Veteran Member Three Rings Jeff_Jeske's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 24 2018
    AZ Member #
    431770
    Location
    Madison WI

    I took a close look at the KW Clubsport 3-way suspension with remote reservoirs. Even with the remote canisters the design of the KW is lacking compared to the JRI which have been tested and developed specifically for our platform. They also have issues with tire clearance where as the JRI shocks learned from the OEM shocks and created a flatside to provide more room for tire clearance.

    Here is the JRI Ultimate Performance shock body:


    JRI vs Stock comparison. Here you can see the JRI shock is significantly shorter than OEM even in it's fully extended state.


    Beta JRI shock setup shows why you don't want the perch or spring close to the tire and why every mm of clearance counts.


    KW setup may create spring to tire contact with some offsets.
    Last edited by Jeff_Jeske; 04-22-2021 at 11:04 AM.

  5. #5
    Junior Member Two Rings rmb73's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 15 2012
    AZ Member #
    90003
    Location
    Spotsylvania, VA

    This is an excellent write up and obviously took some time. Thanks for the information and that is a solid contribution to the forum!!!!
    rmb

  6. #6
    Veteran Member Three Rings Jeff_Jeske's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 24 2018
    AZ Member #
    431770
    Location
    Madison WI

    Thanks. This thread is an invite to ask questions or share other similar experiences. Here are some additional pics:

    Installing JRI test mule suspension. Removed axle from spindle to make live MUCH easier.




    Installed JRI rear 7" spring with helper. The last shot has a spring rubber that further ramps up the rate while on track.




    Cowl cover modified, shock tower modified, Rev 2 GC plates
    Last edited by Jeff_Jeske; 04-22-2021 at 10:49 AM.

  7. #7
    Veteran Member Four Rings
    Join Date
    Jun 11 2012
    AZ Member #
    95025
    My Garage
    2021 Audi SQ5 | 2019 Audi TTRS | 2004 Audi S4 (parted out) | 2000.5 Audi S4 (sold) | 2001 Audi A4 1.
    Location
    Corona, CA

    Great write up, Jeff! I think I’ll probably go with the 034 set if when I do this mod in the future.

  8. #8
    Established Member Two Rings nardoRS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 08 2018
    AZ Member #
    422041
    Location
    UK

    Nice write up Jeff! Be interested to hear how you get on with the KW setup.
    I’ve had the 034 camber plates on for over 10,000 miles now and hardly noticed any NVH. A very well made bit of kit and enabled -2.75degrees camber on my car which gave even wear across the tyres on the track/street.
    2018 TT RS Nardo grey, MSS Track pack, Vagbremtechnic/AP Racing rotors, AP Racing CP9660 calipers, DS1:11 f, DS2500 r, Odyssey 925 battery, rear seat delete, Sparco QRT seats, Schroth 4point harnesses,APR Intercooler, 034 fixed camber plates, Neuspeed RSe11r 18x9.5 45 offset and 034 Motorsports ZTF 18x9.3, Dyno Spectrum DS1 stage 1and2 with 93,100,104 and flex fuel maps, TVS stage 2+ tcu tune, 1340 kg 1/4 tank.

  9. #9
    Established Member Two Rings
    Join Date
    Jun 24 2008
    AZ Member #
    30259
    Location
    Alexandria,Va

    so those 034 plates are non-adjustable?? how do you set camber?

  10. #10
    Veteran Member Three Rings Jeff_Jeske's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 24 2018
    AZ Member #
    431770
    Location
    Madison WI

    034 add a minimum of 1* of negative camber. You adjust overall left to right camber by moving the subframe and adjusting the lower control arm. In most cases you will want to max out the LCA and not even mess with the subframe. Those will locking collars will not be able to adjust camber from the subframe and some difference in left to right camber should be expected. Anything less than a half of a degree won't really matter as the car isn't getting aligned with your body weight in it anyway.
    Last edited by Jeff_Jeske; 04-22-2021 at 11:08 AM.

  11. #11
    Veteran Member Three Rings JGreen76's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 05 2008
    AZ Member #
    29591
    Location
    Houston, TX

    Thanks for taking the time for a great write up, and valuable information!
    Last edited by JGreen76; 01-06-2020 at 01:08 PM. Reason: spelling error
    '21 RS5 Sportback-Tango Red - Black Optics Carbon Package
    '20 R8 Spyder Performance - Kemora Grey - Black Optics Carbon Package
    PAST:
    '21 SQ5 - Quantum Grey
    HIS: 2019 Glacier White TTRS Black Optics///HERS: 2019 Tango Red TTRS///2017 Macan GTS///2014 Q5 3.0T Glacier White with Black Optics///2015 S3..........:::Glacier White, APR Stg3::::.......///2013 MK2 TT Roadster///2007 B7 A4 S-Line 3.2

    IG: TwoCarGarage_HOU

  12. #12
    Veteran Member Four Rings
    Join Date
    Jun 11 2012
    AZ Member #
    95025
    My Garage
    2021 Audi SQ5 | 2019 Audi TTRS | 2004 Audi S4 (parted out) | 2000.5 Audi S4 (sold) | 2001 Audi A4 1.
    Location
    Corona, CA

    Ohlins products have always been top notch and the customer service has followed suit in my experience over the years with Ohlins on my sport bikes and previous cars.

  13. #13
    Junior Member Two Rings rmb73's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 15 2012
    AZ Member #
    90003
    Location
    Spotsylvania, VA

    I have a 2018 TTRS with stock 19’s and magnetic shocks. I’ve done the 034 RSB and F & RSB end links. What are your thoughts on finishing up with 034 camber plates and 034 springs as a simple approach to making a daily driver more capable on a few track day events? I don’t want to add too much NVH, excess tire wear, or make the ride much harsher, but I do want to make it feel better in the corners. I also don’t want to make it too low, as I had a GT4 and I could barely make it up the drive without scraping (cleared front by a few mm). I know these are “beginners” questions, but I figured I would ask and I am not trying to de-rail the thread. Any thoughts are greatly appreciated.
    rmb

  14. #14
    Veteran Member Four Rings
    Join Date
    Jun 11 2012
    AZ Member #
    95025
    My Garage
    2021 Audi SQ5 | 2019 Audi TTRS | 2004 Audi S4 (parted out) | 2000.5 Audi S4 (sold) | 2001 Audi A4 1.
    Location
    Corona, CA

    Quote Originally Posted by rmb73 View Post
    I have a 2018 TTRS with stock 19’s and magnetic shocks. I’ve done the 034 RSB and F & RSB end links. What are your thoughts on finishing up with 034 camber plates and 034 springs as a simple approach to making a daily driver more capable on a few track day events? I don’t want to add too much NVH, excess tire wear, or make the ride much harsher, but I do want to make it feel better in the corners. I also don’t want to make it too low, as I had a GT4 and I could barely make it up the drive without scraping (cleared front by a few mm). I know these are “beginners” questions, but I figured I would ask and I am not trying to de-rail the thread. Any thoughts are greatly appreciated.
    I think this is a simple and good approach, as long as the springs are going to lower the car to a point that you’re happy. I can’t give you any feedback as far as the performance and quality of these springs, but I have read good reviews of the H&R spring kits, and most are happy with both the height and performance which makes me think these will be comparable. 034 has always made quality products in my opinion and I’ve had good experience with their customer service as well. That being said, what I personally don’t like about the spring kits is you’re locked into 1 height. If you don’t like it, well, you just spent money, and possibly time, installing something you don’t want on the car. I like having more flexibility so I’ll be picking up the MSS kit so I can get the exact ride height I want, but also the ability to change it if I decide I want to for whatever reason.

  15. #15
    Veteran Member Three Rings Jeff_Jeske's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 24 2018
    AZ Member #
    431770
    Location
    Madison WI

    Quote Originally Posted by rmb73 View Post
    I have a 2018 TTRS with stock 19’s and magnetic shocks. I’ve done the 034 RSB and F & RSB end links. What are your thoughts on finishing up with 034 camber plates and 034 springs as a simple approach to making a daily driver more capable on a few track day events? I don’t want to add too much NVH, excess tire wear, or make the ride much harsher, but I do want to make it feel better in the corners. I also don’t want to make it too low, as I had a GT4 and I could barely make it up the drive without scraping (cleared front by a few mm). I know these are “beginners” questions, but I figured I would ask and I am not trying to de-rail the thread. Any thoughts are greatly appreciated.
    I think that is an absolutely solid idea. To put your mind at ease... The Tire Rack One Lap winning TTRS was running 034 springs and plates. So those parts performed well on a stage 2 car running street tires.


    Sent from my iPhone using Audizine

  16. #16
    Junior Member Two Rings rmb73's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 15 2012
    AZ Member #
    90003
    Location
    Spotsylvania, VA

    Thank you for the above input and it is greatly appreciated!!!
    rmb

  17. #17
    Active Member Two Rings
    Join Date
    Jun 07 2019
    AZ Member #
    490669
    Location
    california

    What about the official Audi Sport 2-way coilovers? Don't think they are available in the US, but can probably be imported. I saw a price of 1500 euro for them on the UK TT site.

  18. #18
    Veteran Member Three Rings Jeff_Jeske's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 24 2018
    AZ Member #
    431770
    Location
    Madison WI

    Quote Originally Posted by ToastyTT View Post
    What about the official Audi Sport 2-way coilovers? Don't think they are available in the US, but can probably be imported. I saw a price of 1500 euro for them on the UK TT site.
    For us track whores it really depends on spring rates. Most of the off the shelf coils will have very soft springs in the front where all the weight is. A 7k or 8k front spring is not enough to keep the car from rolling over especially under hard braking as you can't fix that with bars.

  19. #19
    Established Member Two Rings nardoRS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 08 2018
    AZ Member #
    422041
    Location
    UK

    The TTRS can be a VERY capable track car with a good spring package (I’m running MSS track w/oem MagneRide), camber plates (I’m on 034 giving around -2.75 camber) and a good geo (bit of toe out in the front is my preference to get the car turned in), track tyre (Nankang AR1).
    Video here of a track day at Croft circuit UK https://youtu.be/NKdOQ9haCZI
    Running 1:33’s dropping to 1:32’s on second visit.
    Very little dive under braking and composed through 105mph + Jim Clark Esses.
    Chasing GT4 on the same day here https://youtu.be/7mVcVMsO3gY
    2018 TT RS Nardo grey, MSS Track pack, Vagbremtechnic/AP Racing rotors, AP Racing CP9660 calipers, DS1:11 f, DS2500 r, Odyssey 925 battery, rear seat delete, Sparco QRT seats, Schroth 4point harnesses,APR Intercooler, 034 fixed camber plates, Neuspeed RSe11r 18x9.5 45 offset and 034 Motorsports ZTF 18x9.3, Dyno Spectrum DS1 stage 1and2 with 93,100,104 and flex fuel maps, TVS stage 2+ tcu tune, 1340 kg 1/4 tank.

  20. #20
    Established Member Two Rings nardoRS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 08 2018
    AZ Member #
    422041
    Location
    UK

    Here’s a good photo comparison with a new Porsche GT3 through the same corner.
    Attached Images
    2018 TT RS Nardo grey, MSS Track pack, Vagbremtechnic/AP Racing rotors, AP Racing CP9660 calipers, DS1:11 f, DS2500 r, Odyssey 925 battery, rear seat delete, Sparco QRT seats, Schroth 4point harnesses,APR Intercooler, 034 fixed camber plates, Neuspeed RSe11r 18x9.5 45 offset and 034 Motorsports ZTF 18x9.3, Dyno Spectrum DS1 stage 1and2 with 93,100,104 and flex fuel maps, TVS stage 2+ tcu tune, 1340 kg 1/4 tank.

  21. #21
    Veteran Member Three Rings Jeff_Jeske's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 24 2018
    AZ Member #
    431770
    Location
    Madison WI

    Interesting discovery tonight....

    I was test fitting my GC plates without the shock installed. Just checking full range of motion to ensure there's no contact in the tower. I marked the plates and remove them only to discover I'm unable to use the entire camber adjustment range. In fact there's approximately 1/4" worth of "slot" that is unusable.

    I scratched my head on that one for a bit because I was able to use the full range of motion of the Vorshlag plates. So I put some mini glue dots on the moving portion to see where they are making contact. It turns out it's the corners of the plates.

    Go back in the house grab the vorshlag and immediately see the difference. The Vorshlag plates have an additional spacer that covers the top of the plate. This not only gives the plate more breathing room but it also limits the contact patch of the moving parts which is kind of nice. With the GC plate the entire surface of the plate is smashed against the inside of the shock tower. Additionally the edges of the GC plates are more rounded than the ones on the V-plates. The steeper angle of the V-plates give it even more room.

    So I said what if I simply put washers over the bolts prior to installing to see if I could get more movement.... yep that gave a bit more.... I suppose you could also grind a steeper edge on the GC plates to recover space as well. But as I'm thinking about this I'm like WTF...

    To make this work I need to take an angle grinder to my shocks, a circular saw to my shock tower, cut up my cowl cover, rig the plates with washers and possibly also grind them down?????? FML!

    Take a second look at the pictures above to reference what I'm talking about.
    Last edited by Jeff_Jeske; 01-07-2020 at 05:05 PM.

  22. #22
    Veteran Member Three Rings Jeff_Jeske's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 24 2018
    AZ Member #
    431770
    Location
    Madison WI

    I guess I should comment that I don't know what the actual camber adjustment would be as it sits. But there are some build differences that are very interesting. I will be taking some measurements to determine if it's a none issue.
    Last edited by Jeff_Jeske; 01-08-2020 at 09:33 AM.

  23. #23
    Veteran Member Three Rings Jeff_Jeske's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 24 2018
    AZ Member #
    431770
    Location
    Madison WI

    More discoveries.....

    The Ground Control plates are what I would consider heavy duty. The plate that the shock actually mounts in is thicker than the Vorshlag plate. Once you add the top sliding piece it gets closer to thickness of the GC plates but that slider doesn't add any strength to the plate.

    Why do I bring this up? It's a funny story...

    As I'm handling the GC plate I'm complaining about how thick they are and that they have this bulge on top that doesn't seem to need to be there. I pick up the Vorshlag plate and see signs of spidering in the aluminum!!! After disassembly and inspection you can see the plate is actually bowed a bit from one of the hard impacts it took!!! I'm betting one or two more hits like that and it would have shattered sending the shock body up into the shock tower ... and if I had cut open the shock tower it likely would have punched into the hood.

    I envision being a track travelling down the front straight at triple digit speeds clipping a rumble strip and completely loosing suspension in one of your front wheels.

    Would this kind of damage have happened with proper suspension travel from the start?? Your guess is as good as mine.

  24. #24
    Junior Member Two Rings
    Join Date
    Jan 07 2020
    AZ Member #
    533321
    Location
    Moneta, VA

    Any thoughts on the Bilstein Clubsports (48-253864)? It looks like they come with their own camber plates.

    I'm taking delivery of a 2016 TT today. Planning on prepping it for SCCA STH autocross and SCAA Time Trial in whatever Tuner class they put it in. Hopefully One Lap in 2021 as well.

    Was leaning toward the Ohlins until reading your commentary (here and I think in another thread I found) about the rear travel. Now I'm feeling like maybe the Bilsteins are a solid choice.

  25. #25
    Senior Member Two Rings
    Join Date
    May 01 2016
    AZ Member #
    372658
    Location
    Central Florida

    It's a shame we all live so far apart. It would really be interesting to compare telemetry from different setups, same track same day. I appreciate all of the experience being shared but I'm honestly surprised at how stable my setup is with just MSS track pack, O34 camber plates and RSB. I'm not sure that I could get more speed from a more extreme setup at my skill level.
    2023 Kyalami Green RS3
    2022 Dodge Durango SRT (Daily/Hauler)
    2015 Harley Road Glide
    2024 Aprilia Tuareg 660

  26. #26
    Veteran Member Three Rings Jeff_Jeske's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 24 2018
    AZ Member #
    431770
    Location
    Madison WI

    Quote Originally Posted by Pylons View Post
    Any thoughts on the Bilstein Clubsports (48-253864)? It looks like they come with their own camber plates.

    I'm taking delivery of a 2016 TT today. Planning on prepping it for SCCA STH autocross and SCAA Time Trial in whatever Tuner class they put it in. Hopefully One Lap in 2021 as well.

    Was leaning toward the Ohlins until reading your commentary (here and I think in another thread I found) about the rear travel. Now I'm feeling like maybe the Bilsteins are a solid choice.
    I have heard good things about the Bilstein Clubsports but have no personal experience. What are the spring rates? Do they allow for custom rates? Are the springs linear or progressive? Is anyone actually running them on a TT for track duty? At this point in the game I have absolutely no trust in any of the products that manufacturers are rushing to the market for this platform. Seems like its more about a money grab rather than producing a well tested and superior product.

    Quote Originally Posted by HHughes1 View Post
    It's a shame we all live so far apart. It would really be interesting to compare telemetry from different setups, same track same day. I appreciate all of the experience being shared but I'm honestly surprised at how stable my setup is with just MSS track pack, O34 camber plates and RSB. I'm not sure that I could get more speed from a more extreme setup at my skill level.
    There are many improvements that come from a high end set of coilovers. Most are hard to explain but easily felt when driving on track. But if you need an example, when when running aggressive track only brake pads and sticky tires the stock setup even with aftermarket springs cannot prevent the brake dive from 1.4G of braking. The car will feel like it nose dives, this will upset the alignment and sometimes it wont even track straight. That behavior goes away completely when suspension is dialed in. The car stays flat braking it better distributed across all wheels and transitions are just all around smoother. There are many more but that is perhaps the easiest one to feel IF you have race pads and tires on the car. If you don't then fix that problem first.

  27. #27
    Veteran Member Four Rings
    Join Date
    Jun 11 2012
    AZ Member #
    95025
    My Garage
    2021 Audi SQ5 | 2019 Audi TTRS | 2004 Audi S4 (parted out) | 2000.5 Audi S4 (sold) | 2001 Audi A4 1.
    Location
    Corona, CA

    Coilovers - Camber Plates - Travel Bump/Droop - My Lessons Learned

    Quote Originally Posted by Jeff_Jeske View Post
    ...when when running aggressive track only brake pads and sticky tires the stock setup even with aftermarket springs cannot prevent the brake dive from 1.4G of braking.
    Out of curiosity, with your track setup, what kind of lateral Gs are you hitting? My personal best was 1.2G with 19s and Michelin PSSs, otherwise stock, on the street.

    Last edited by mtwallace85; 01-09-2020 at 09:59 AM.

  28. #28
    Junior Member Two Rings
    Join Date
    Jan 07 2020
    AZ Member #
    533321
    Location
    Moneta, VA

    Quote Originally Posted by Jeff_Jeske View Post
    I have heard good things about the Bilstein Clubsports but have no personal experience. What are the spring rates? Do they allow for custom rates? Are the springs linear or progressive? Is anyone actually running them on a TT for track duty? At this point in the game I have absolutely no trust in any of the products that manufacturers are rushing to the market for this platform. Seems like its more about a money grab rather than producing a well tested and superior product.
    This post indicated 570/417:
    https://www.audizine.com/forum/showt...for-suspension

    Looking at Bilstein documentation, which has spring dimensions:
    https://productdeskapi.cart.bilstein...M4-Y716A00.pdf

    and using a spring calculator (https://www.thespringstore.com/sprin...alculator.html) and making a semi-educated guess at material, I get 350-ish front, linear

    the rears are progressive...not sure how to use the calculator correctly to get rates there.

  29. #29
    Junior Member Two Rings
    Join Date
    Jan 07 2020
    AZ Member #
    533321
    Location
    Moneta, VA

    and maybe now I'm leaning toward KW Clubsport 3's...

  30. #30
    Veteran Member Three Rings Jeff_Jeske's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 24 2018
    AZ Member #
    431770
    Location
    Madison WI

    Quote Originally Posted by mtwallace85 View Post
    Out of curiosity, with your track setup, what kind of lateral Gs are you hitting? My personal best was 1.2G with 19s and Michelin PSSs, otherwise stock, on the street.
    The PS4S and similar tires are not very sticky. They are great for 3-season driving though. The difference between what you are running and the top of the food chain RE71R tire is night and day. Even in cold I see 1.4G lateral and 1.3 on braking but I'm still using DS1.11 pads and they aren't anything to write home about. I'm not sure you would see any more MAX G with better suspension but the transition to and out of max G would likely be much more composed. I too only see 1G on launch as well but that is a power limitation as it's good enough for a 1.60 60ft time at the strip.

  31. #31
    Veteran Member Three Rings Jeff_Jeske's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 24 2018
    AZ Member #
    431770
    Location
    Madison WI

    Quote Originally Posted by Pylons View Post
    and maybe now I'm leaning toward KW Clubsport 3's...
    I don't know anyone running the 3-way KWs. I have heard of a number of people running Golf-R KW CS 2-ways without issue. KW tells me they have sold multiple sets and had no issues.

    I know Verkline sells these and does offer custom valving for an additional fee. Not knowing how the standard valving rides has me questioning whether or not to go stiffer as compliance is not always about just the spring rates.

    They sure are attractive as they come with camber plates and remote reservoirs. Kind of the best bolt on option I've seen at the price point of $3700.


  32. #32
    Veteran Member Four Rings
    Join Date
    Jun 11 2012
    AZ Member #
    95025
    My Garage
    2021 Audi SQ5 | 2019 Audi TTRS | 2004 Audi S4 (parted out) | 2000.5 Audi S4 (sold) | 2001 Audi A4 1.
    Location
    Corona, CA

    Quote Originally Posted by Jeff_Jeske View Post
    The PS4S and similar tires are not very sticky. They are great for 3-season driving though. The difference between what you are running and the top of the food chain RE71R tire is night and day. Even in cold I see 1.4G lateral and 1.3 on braking but I'm still using DS1.11 pads and they aren't anything to write home about. I'm not sure you would see any more MAX G with better suspension but the transition to and out of max G would likely be much more composed. I too only see 1G on launch as well but that is a power limitation as it's good enough for a 1.60 60ft time at the strip.
    Thanks for the clarification and detailed explanation.

    1.4G with cold tires

    That’s pretty amazing if you ask me. I think I need a second set of super lightweight wheels with some R comp tires now lol. So what are you seeing when the tires are all warmed up then?

  33. #33
    Veteran Member Three Rings Jeff_Jeske's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 24 2018
    AZ Member #
    431770
    Location
    Madison WI

    Depends on the tires. RE71R are grippy when cold slippery when hot. Something like an R888R is slippery cold and sticky hot. I have never seen the G-meter go north of 1.4G.

  34. #34
    Veteran Member Four Rings littleredwagen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 08 2008
    AZ Member #
    23964
    My Garage
    2019 Tango Red TTRS
    Location
    Vero Beach, FL

    Quote Originally Posted by Jeff_Jeske View Post
    Something like an R888R is slippery cold and sticky hot.
    And Loud AF to boot.
    -Matt
    2019 TTRS Tango Red
    Past:
    2017 Ara Blue S3
    2011 S4 Prestige 6mt Black
    2001.5 S4 EPL Stage 3 Yellow
    2005 S4 Avant 6spd Red

  35. #35
    Junior Member Two Rings
    Join Date
    Jan 07 2020
    AZ Member #
    533321
    Location
    Moneta, VA

    Quote Originally Posted by Jeff_Jeske View Post
    I don't know anyone running the 3-way KWs. I have heard of a number of people running Golf-R KW CS 2-ways without issue. KW tells me they have sold multiple sets and had no issues.

    I know Verkline sells these and does offer custom valving for an additional fee. Not knowing how the standard valving rides has me questioning whether or not to go stiffer as compliance is not always about just the spring rates.

    They sure are attractive as they come with camber plates and remote reservoirs. Kind of the best bolt on option I've seen at the price point of $3700.

    Interesting that Verkline's price is so low (although it's 3700 euros, not dollars...so more like $4100, but that's $600 less than what I found advertised in USD)

    I had KW Variant 2's...so not as high end--double adjustable and no remote reservoirs, but otherwise seemingly similar...on a prior car (FR-S) and was happy with them.

  36. #36
    Veteran Member Three Rings Jeff_Jeske's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 24 2018
    AZ Member #
    431770
    Location
    Madison WI

    ^ No. Its actually $3650 USD .... as you don't pay VAT ... and you should avoid local/state tax as well. I haven't found better pricing and I've been looking around for awhile.
    https://www.verkline.com/shop/all-pa...tt-rs-ttrs-8s/

  37. #37
    Junior Member Two Rings
    Join Date
    Jan 07 2020
    AZ Member #
    533321
    Location
    Moneta, VA

    oh wow...I didn't see the option of actually listing prices in USD until now...nice!

    I might be filling the shopping cart there pretty soon.

    thanks!
    Last edited by Pylons; 01-10-2020 at 12:43 PM.

  38. #38
    Veteran Member Three Rings Jeff_Jeske's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 24 2018
    AZ Member #
    431770
    Location
    Madison WI

    Exclamation

    You know how 034 advertises their plates as having rubber inserts? This supposedly limits NVH, but it can also allow the shock shaft to move upward as the rubber is flexible. You may think you have clearance for the shaft in the shock tower when the car is at rest but as the suspension travels the rubber puck inside the camber plate allows the entire center section to lift up resulting in unexpected issues. On a hard hit like a corner curb or even a large pot hole it's possible for the shaft to make contact with the tower. This is concerning not only for damage to the car but fatigue to the rubber in the plate. I wonder how many hits it can take before it give out similar to what would have happened with my Vorshlag plate that started to fracture.

    Whats even more concerning is where the plate mates with the tower. If you look closely at that picture and you will see the imprint of the camber plate in the steel of the shock tower. Now this is not my car but I am aware that this was a hard suspension hit with 11k front springs so fairly stiff. From this it's pretty apparent that our towers are not bulletproof. When running stiff suspension we need to make every effort to get maximum shock stroke and dampening to reduce the force our shock tower has to deal with.

    One last thing, people say cutting open the shock tower is fine but if you look at the second picture there is paint flaking off the bulge of the tower so it obviously absorbed some of the force that the tower received. I suspect that they do provide some rigidity to the tower. If any of you have an engineering background it would be interesting to hear your spin on things.

    From an everyday ordinary guy point of view, I still think the 034 plates are top choice on a daily driver. But if you drive aggressively on track you might want to take a second look at alternatives.



    Last edited by Jeff_Jeske; 01-12-2020 at 06:30 AM.

  39. #39
    Veteran Member Three Rings Jeff_Jeske's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 24 2018
    AZ Member #
    431770
    Location
    Madison WI

    A few of us have been working with Ground Control to optimize their plates for the following reasons:
    1. They are very heavy duty
    2. They can be used to provide max travel
    3. They come with a re-enforcing top ring
    4. Support is fantastic
    5. No modifications of any kind are required with the magride shocks

    They are entertaining providing a second re-enforcement ring that can be used on the bottom side of the shock tower to:
    1. Space the plate away from the tower allowing more camber adjustment or clearance for the top coilover adjuster.
    2. Distribute the load evenly on the tower over a wider patch that will not deform.

    They have also agreed to right size the bolts in order to avoid having to cut the cowl cover. I'll share more updates as I get them.

  40. #40
    Veteran Member Three Rings Jeff_Jeske's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 24 2018
    AZ Member #
    431770
    Location
    Madison WI

    Here is an example of what I think will end up being the new standard:

    -Complete shock tower dome removed with GC camber plates spaced down from tower using the horse shoe included with the plates. This could be further reinforced by another horseshoe on top of the tower. But sadly for us TTRS guys there isn't enough room to fit the top mount without cutting the cowl cover.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  


    © 2001-2025 Audizine, Audizine.com, and Driverzines.com
    Audizine is an independently owned and operated automotive enthusiast community and news website.
    Audi and the Audi logo(s) are copyright/trademark Audi AG. Audizine is not endorsed by or affiliated with Audi AG.