
Originally Posted by
Oneill_1952
OEM Pads are Composite
Composite brake pads contain steel wool or fibers that provide strength and carry heat away from the brake rotors. The downside to composites is they tend to be noisy and abrasive, causing greater wear to the rotors. As composites wear, they produce visible brake dust that sticks to the alloy wheels which then need cleaning more often as the dust accumulates.
EBC Red Stuff Ceramic (what i'm currently running)
Copper fibers replaced steel in ceramic composites, producing a brake pad that reduced friction on the pads and rotors, eliminating the squeal of steel-based composites. As ceramic pads wear, they produce a lighter, less visible dust that does not stick to alloy wheels. As a result, drivers find ceramics to be much cleaner. Ceramic pads are longer lasting than steel-based composites as the ceramic material wears more evenly.
Thanks. So if I understand correctly Audi OEMs are composite with steel fibers in other words semi-metallic. I like the feel of the original pads and do not need more stopping power and have no noise or dust issues. Also I do not experience excess rotor rusting. Some occurs but is quickly worn off.
Some brands stress that they are copper free. Why? Does copper adhere to the rotors? I had that experience with motorbike brakes years ago.
It seems that most brands push ceramics without providing reasons. I take that as voodoo , higher profit margins. I looked at the major brands and their websites provide almost nothing useful except fitment advice.
Bookmarks