Simple cwa50 to cwa100-3 compare.
There is a couple of degree C decrease in IAT temp rise based on the conditions I tested in.
Tested with: Q5, 3.0 ZF 8HP trans, APR V4 100 octane OEM HE & AWE reservoir/divorced , PR 3.27. I used to run a PR 3.1 and stock 6300 rpm shift point and with that config my minimal setup actually worked really well: IAT 65C @85F with E25 no timing pull or bypass opening. When I changed from a 179 to 189 crank pulley w/E35 and used HP Tuners MVPI2 editor to change shift points to 7000 rpm, no surprise - my IAT's were no longer ok. This configuration should provide a good test case as my HE does not represent optimal cooling so if coolant flow is a limiting factor this should show it.
I logged using HP Tuners scanner tool, which provides a GUI to review data down to the .1 second across all channels logged, I don't use VCDS anymore.
Track Results
CWA50
Outside temp 74F DA 2148
0 mph IAT start 110F 43C
End
115 mph IAT end 166F 74C
Temp Rise in 31C
CWA100-3
Outside temp 77F DA 2572
0 mph IAT start 113F 45C
End
115 mph IAT end 72C
Temp Rise 27C or a 4C reduction in temp rise.
While these results are not earth shattering the CWA100 did reduce temp rise, my assumption is the impact "could" be larger with a Killer Chiller or Performance HE. I would also note, as has been previously reported, highway cruising temps also come down to 7 or so degree C over ambient, this is probably one of the best part of the pump, keeps the engine ready for those short term boost needs.
The Tecomotive kit is completely plug and play:
https://tecomotive.com/store/en/bund...-3-adapter-kit
Hardest part of installing the kit was the hidden nut inside the pump mounting cage, that could be my 2013 Q design but that wasn't fun.
Bookmarks