
Originally Posted by
christianb5s4
I bought the OE Audi/VW crankshaft pulley from ECS which was $400, I'm doing all the belts and water pump at the same time as well as the oil separator, PCV, carbon cleaning etc. Labor is going to be $700 for everything.
If you were just doing the pulley I'd imagine it's $200-300 for labor depending on where you take it and how familiar they are with the 3.0T. FWIW, I researched at length crankshaft pulleys for my built B5 S4 and ended up with a new OE item. You could go the Fluidamper route but I highly recommend not going for a solid pulley, NVH is the least of your concerns. It helps dampen harmonics that would otherwise be transmitted through the engine's internals and could cause increased bearing wear.
I worry about your decision to go with another OEM crank pulley. I hope all goes well for you.
I respectfully, but strongly, disagree regarding the solid crank pulley causing bearing wear. There are hundreds of us running solid crank pulleys like JHM, in either the standard or overdrive sizes on the 3.0 TFSI engine and just about zero reports of any premature engine wear. Those of us who have had Blackstone oil analysis are not seeing any increase in values, wear related or otherwise. The one piece crank pulley absolutely 100 percent eliminates the all-to-frequently reported separation of the two pieces of the OEM part.
The JHM part is about $400-450. It took me less than one hour to remove the OEM pulley and install the one piece replacement. Lots of threads on this over at the B8 S4 sub forum section here. I did not even have to put the front end in service position. Some people say that makes access easier. Perhaps, but it can be easily done from below without service position. This is not the same engine or same crank pulley as the B5 S4 2.7L biturbo.
I can discern absolutely no increase in NVH on my Q5. BTW: this is not a harmonic balancer. The engine is internally balanced. The crank pulley has two belts, one to drive accessories, the other, out front, to drive the supercharger. Presumably Audi wanted to reduce the already low NVH by adding that band of rubber between the two pieces. I simply cannot tell any difference in NVH in actual use, however. But, the OEM design is highly prone to failure.
Replacing a failed or soon-to-fail OEM crank pulley with a new OEM one will only result in a second failure over time.
I do admit that I went with a 179mm oversize pulley, because I was going to a stage 2 tune. However, I was going to replace the OEM pulley with a standard size solid pulley had I stayed at stage 1. JHM (and other companies) make both stock diameter and larger, depending on your tuning needs. These are highly reliable.
Bookmarks