I don't really get the shims thing. They seem only relevant to the old 50:50 diffs. I assume the Stasis shim thing is the same process as
https://jhmotorsports.com/jhm-4-1-ce...rans-only.html
The asymmetric T-3 0AQ in the Q7 (SSP 363) has a 42/58 (1:1.381) static torque split, with a dynamic range from 60/40 to 23/75.
The asymmetric T-2 0B2 in the Q5 (SSP 429) has a 40:60 (1:1.50) static torque split, with a dynamic range from 66/33 to 15/85. That would imply a TBR of 2:1 forward and 5.5:1 rearward.
But if you consider that the asymmetric means that one rearward torque = 1.5 forward torque, the TBR to the rear is actually more like 3.75:1, and the TBR to the front is more like 3.0:1. Which seem a more reasonable ratio range.
40 front *1.00:1 = 40, * 1.50 = 60 rear
15 front *3.75:1 ~= 56, *1.50 ~= 85 rear
66 front / 3.00:1 = 22, *1.50 = 33 rear
If we take this back to the Q7 asymmetric T-3, now we see a more steady 2.33±.1:1
42 front *1.00:1 = 42, *1.381 = 58 rear
23 front *2.42:1 = 56, *1.381 = 77 rear
60 front / 2.25:1 = 27, *1.381 = 40 rear
So the actual TBRs in the Q7 T-3 are in the 2s, and I think I remember reading somewhere that number. Assuming this kind of math is even valid. It just multiplies out and makes a nice chart; no idea if it's a legitimate computation of TBR in an asymmetric Torsen.
But I've never seen a 60/40 quoted for the B8 front distribution. The usual text is 40/60, with a range from 70/30 to 20/80. Let's assume the SSP 363 numbers are particular to the 6 planet gear 0AQ. So let's assume our 5 planet gear 0B4/0B6 are different, and we end up with 3±.5:1 range
40 front *1.00:1 = 40, *1.50 = 60 rear
20 front *2.67:1 = 53, *1.50 = 80 rear
70 front / 3.50:1 = 20, *1.50 = 30 rear
So all in all, I don't really think the old school 50/50 split 2:1 TBR mod work is going to blindly apply to the asymmetrics without some engineering validation. I would think a message to someone such as JHM would be the quick answer to if anyone mods the asymmetrics.
Bookmarks