
Originally Posted by
JamesRS5
Been there with FK coilovers, look nice and shiney but terrible rebound damping had the car bouncing almost out of control, I pulled the damper apart to look at the insert, when I compared the damper insert on their spare parts list, the same part number was used in just about all their dampers, no matter what the weight of the car or spring used.
This is the main issue. The fly by night Chinese companies will put the same damper on any chassis that has a following and demand. They don't specify performance based on motion ratios, spring rates, vehicle/chassis weight distribution, intended use, etc. It's one size fits all, and they make them bolt up. Then they go on to add "36 way adjustable" capability, which just opens up a whole can of worms. Increasing compression stiffness affects rebound stiffness, and vice versa. There's an inherent amount of cross talk between the two, and without knowing what the baseline is, you're just guessing what clicks of a knob will do. Sure you might get relative changes, but as far as actually being able to dial in the package to the vehicle, forget it. Lastly, just look at who will provide you spring rates. If they don't know them, why would you buy their product? Throw in shock/strut shaft size and seal materials, and the real deals quickly separate from the junk. Bilstein inverted monotubes have BIG shafts (~45-50mm diameter on my TT), and can handle full droop, airborne jumps with ease. Cheap, tiny shafts, not so much. This is also an unpublished number most of the time. At the end of the day, you get what you pay for.
Bookmarks