C7-C7.5 A6/A7 3.0T 1/4 Mile Database

[wootwoot]

So who has the bigger numbers 034? Or IE?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Looking at the times posted there is no dominant company, the leaderboard is random. The only clear winning combo is running high octane gas. People running E40 or 104 octane take all the top spots.

[Shuga]

Looking at the times posted there is no dominant company, the leaderboard is random. The only clear winning combo is running high octane gas. People running E40 or 104 octane take all the top spots.

Just trying to figure it out for my daily.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[wootwoot]

Just trying to figure it out for my daily.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Me too. I have 6 more months of warranty and then I'll start modding.

[Shuga]

Me too. I have 6 more months of warranty and then I'll start modding.

Make sure you get a clean bill of health before that warranty is up


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[chet.rowles]

Quite pleased! Full to the brim gas tank on straight 93 and roughly 200lbs of stereo/subs/amps. (didn't think the dragy would arrive so quickly, but wanted to give it a go. Image1579991610.137945.jpg best she had ran at the track prior to EPL TCU Tune was 12.6 at 111, however that was with less than 1/4 tank of fuel and no sub box, in almost identical DAs. So, butt dyno is about right here. The EPL TCU tune is worth about .5 seconds in the 1/4 on my 2018 A6. Nice work! Image1579991950.258305.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Audizine

[f4m0u5]

Quite pleased! Full to the brim gas tank on straight 93 and roughly 200lbs of stereo/subs/amps. (didn't think the dragy would arrive so quickly, but wanted to give it a go. Image1579991610.137945.jpg best she had ran at the track prior to EPL TCU Tune was 12.6 at 111, however that was with less than 1/4 tank of fuel and no sub box, in almost identical DAs. So, butt dyno is about right here. The EPL TCU tune is worth about .5 seconds in the 1/4 on my 2018 A6. Nice work! Image1579991950.258305.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Audizine

Very nice times! Thats on stage 1 software for the new style motor?

[joe916]

Just trying to figure it out for my daily.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

top 3 are IE/APR/034 they all have been proven to trap over 120mph others haven't came close

[joe916]

you don't even own a c7 lol

same engine same trans difference is weight whats your point?

[wootwoot]

top 3 are IE/APR/034 they all have been proven to trap over 120mph others haven't came close

All running E40. Octane is a bigger predictor of fast quartermile times here than the tuning company.

[joe916]

All running E40. Octane is a bigger predictor of fast quartermile times here than the tuning company.

i could be wrong but i have yet to see any EPL 3.0t trap over 120mph on any race gas file please prove me wrong

[Shane Horning]

All running E40. Octane is a bigger predictor of fast quartermile times here than the tuning company.

I have trapped 120.5 via dragy on straight 93 with a6 but yea I totally agree

Sent from my SM-G935V using Audizine mobile app

[joe916]

I have trapped 120.5 via dragy on straight 93 with a6 but yea I totally agree

Sent from my SM-G935V using Audizine mobile app

GOALS!!! IE/HP TCU=SAUCE

[tehnighthawk]

same engine same trans difference is weight whats your point?

Weight, aerodynamics, gearing, tire size, chassis, wheelbase...should i go on?

[Tony@EPL]

i could be wrong but i have yet to see any EPL 3.0t trap over 120mph on any race gas file please prove me wrong

Its clear you do not like my company and you will continue to post false information where ever possible. We have a great product, many happy customers.... to your comment above , we have MANY cars trapping 120+.

This is one running our production 93 octane file with a few gallons of e85. I believe we had the 2nd B8 chassis to trap 120+ back in 2015 when we set the 1/4 mile record.

[joe916]

Weight, aerodynamics, gearing, tire size, chassis, wheelbase...should i go on?

yes that is correct and its good information for the sq5/q5 3.0t since we share the same engine and trans a6 guys definitely have the weight and aero advantage over us but we are not far behind on the 1/4 list

[joe916]

I will just let the 1/4 list do the talking

[Shane Horning]

I will just let the 1/4 list do the talking

Problem is the list doesn't include everything and isn't up to date all the time

Sent from my SM-G935V using Audizine mobile app

[jrp916]

Problem is the list doesn't include everything and isn't up to date all the time

Sent from my SM-G935V using Audizine mobile app

Spreadsheet is currently up to date, see link below-

https://drive.google.com/open?id=1mA..._H2Dk1tNF3yuGF

I'm not the original poster so I can't change the original link. I'm only adding official entries with timeslips to keep it fair.

[Shane Horning]

Spreadsheet is currently up to date, see link below-

https://drive.google.com/open?id=1mA..._H2Dk1tNF3yuGF

I'm not the original poster so I can't change the original link. I'm only adding official entries with timeslips to keep it fair.

Sent from my SM-G935V using Audizine mobile app

[joe916]

Problem is the list doesn't include everything and isn't up to date all the time

Sent from my SM-G935V using Audizine mobile app

and i really think dragy numbers should be on there as well its been proven to be accurate

[jrp916]

and i really think dragy numbers should be on there as well its been proven to be accurate

I’m ok with that as long as its in the proper format (see post #1).


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[jrp916]

Did u notice the guy you were raggin on with 12.9 was in 80 degree temps compared to theese i your posting in the low 30s? 50 degrees is alot expecially when heat soaks part of it and car driven to the track on hot day. Not saying that makes up for the .55 difference between you two

Man I just learned this first hand. I went to the track when it was about 70f, but the sun was on full blast. I think the air temps on the actual track were 85f+. Anyways I could only muster a 13.1 with my APR stage 1 and trans tune. I do also need better tires and maybe a Carbon cleaning? My 0-60 at the track was only 4.9sec. Later in the day when the sun started setting and it started to cool off some my 0-60 went down to 4.3, would have been under 4.0 with better tires and better road.

[joe916]

Man I just learned this first hand. I went to the track when it was about 70f, but the sun was on full blast. I think the air temps on the actual track were 85f+. Anyways I could only muster a 13.1 with my APR stage 1 and trans tune. I do also need better tires and maybe a Carbon cleaning? My 0-60 at the track was only 4.9sec. Later in the day when the sun started setting and it started to cool off some my 0-60 went down to 4.3, would have been under 4.0 with better tires and better road.

numbers seem wayyy off even in 70f temps you should be running mid 12 easily with a trans tune

- - - Updated - - -

Man I just learned this first hand. I went to the track when it was about 70f, but the sun was on full blast. I think the air temps on the actual track were 85f+. Anyways I could only muster a 13.1 with my APR stage 1 and trans tune. I do also need better tires and maybe a Carbon cleaning? My 0-60 at the track was only 4.9sec. Later in the day when the sun started setting and it started to cool off some my 0-60 went down to 4.3, would have been under 4.0 with better tires and better road.

what was your 60ft

[jrp916]

numbers seem wayyy off even in 70f temps you should be running mid 12 easily with a trans tune

- - - Updated - - -



what was your 60ft

Ya I was hoping for alot better. It was the first time at the track with this car so only got 2 decent runs, best 60' was 1.99, personal best about 6 months ago with better tires and no trans tune was 1.93 but in was much cooler (I think around 60f). Did a 1.96 when I did some testing later in the day just recently when it was slightly cooler. I think I just need better tires and some more testing. Might need a carbon cleaning, only have 67k miles but its a 2012. First I'm going to get back to the track on a Wednesday night and see what it does, should at least be a high 12.

[f4m0u5]

Man I just learned this first hand. I went to the track when it was about 70f, but the sun was on full blast. I think the air temps on the actual track were 85f+. Anyways I could only muster a 13.1 with my APR stage 1 and trans tune. I do also need better tires and maybe a Carbon cleaning? My 0-60 at the track was only 4.9sec. Later in the day when the sun started setting and it started to cool off some my 0-60 went down to 4.3, would have been under 4.0 with better tires and better road.

Ya temps really make a big difference. Maybe not 40f to 60f but wen u start getting higher it really hurts performance.

Ya I was hoping for alot better. It was the first time at the track with this car so only got 2 decent runs, best 60' was 1.99, personal best about 6 months ago with better tires and no trans tune was 1.93 but in was much cooler (I think around 60f). Did a 1.96 when I did some testing later in the day just recently when it was slightly cooler. I think I just need better tires and some more testing. Might need a carbon cleaning, only have 67k miles but its a 2012. First I'm going to get back to the track on a Wednesday night and see what it does, should at least be a high 12.

Whats your launch method? If your tires are breaking loose then id agree tires would be needed.

I launched my car few days ago for first time.
Sport mode, traction controll off, break, throttle, roms climb to 2400 on epl tcu tune. Then let go of brake and it launches pretty hard! No tire spin at all. I feel like the launch could be 200 to 400 rpms higher because i feel a slight hesitation but then it kicks you in seat pretty hard

Also what tcu tune do you have? Whats the launch rpm and shift rpm?


Lastly what size rims? Maybe the 19s and 20s loose the grip with the stiffer smaller sidewall.

[tehnighthawk]

Ya I was hoping for alot better. It was the first time at the track with this car so only got 2 decent runs, best 60' was 1.99, personal best about 6 months ago with better tires and no trans tune was 1.93 but in was much cooler (I think around 60f). Did a 1.96 when I did some testing later in the day just recently when it was slightly cooler. I think I just need better tires and some more testing. Might need a carbon cleaning, only have 67k miles but its a 2012. First I'm going to get back to the track on a Wednesday night and see what it does, should at least be a high 12.

I'm starting to wonder if the lack of traction on the street is actually a good thing that helps these cars take off better. Even with a stage 1 tune I seem to have too much grip at the track. I've never datalogged or draggy on the street but it would be interesting to compare.

[WatchMeSpend]

I'm starting to wonder if the lack of traction on the street is actually a good thing that helps these cars take off better. Even with a stage 1 tune I seem to have too much grip at the track. I've never datalogged or draggy on the street but it would be interesting to compare.

Well in the world of drag racing we always say it is better to spin than to bog. However the A6 on boost, straining against the torque converter doesn't seem to bog. Looks like a 7 speed DSG is more likely. Every RS6/RS7 vs RS3 vs RS4 vs RS5 vs R8 video, the RS6/RS7 with the torque converter is out ahead first. Obviously the R8 chases it down, but in a line it's great to see the car burst ahead first.

[jrp916]

Ya temps really make a big difference. Maybe not 40f to 60f but wen u start getting higher it really hurts performance.




Whats your launch method? If your tires are breaking loose then id agree tires would be needed.

I launched my car few days ago for first time.
Sport mode, traction controll off, break, throttle, roms climb to 2400 on epl tcu tune. Then let go of brake and it launches pretty hard! No tire spin at all. I feel like the launch could be 200 to 400 rpms higher because i feel a slight hesitation but then it kicks you in seat pretty hard

Also what tcu tune do you have? Whats the launch rpm and shift rpm?


Lastly what size rims? Maybe the 19s and 20s loose the grip with the stiffer smaller sidewall.

Honestly I can't really feel when I lose traction at the track because the windows are up and my best gauge is hearing it, but I do know it's slipping some. I already am running 19's.

I still am running the stock hx. I really think once your IAT's get a little higher its much harder to make power. There was also a stage 1 manual s4 there also with a stock hx. He could only muster a 13.0. We let our cars cool some between runs, but you have to sit idle for a few mins before launching.

Is there a way to show your IAT's on the MMI or with some other gauge? I also heard you can get your oil temps on the MMI?

[f4m0u5]

Honestly I can't really feel when I lose traction at the track because the windows are up and my best gauge is hearing it, but I do know it's slipping some. I already am running 19's.

I still am running the stock hx. I really think once your IAT's get a little higher its much harder to make power. There was also a stage 1 manual s4 there also with a stock hx. He could only muster a 13.0. We let our cars cool some between runs, but you have to sit idle for a few mins before launching.

Is there a way to show your IAT's on the MMI or with some other gauge? I also heard you can get your oil temps on the MMI?

I meant the 18s would be best with more grip, but p3u has proved me wrong with his 10.9 with 20s lmao. So ya maybe a new tire.

If you have vag com just log the runs on laptop in passenger seat. Or obd 11 on a cellphone/tablet. Not postive about getting them onto the mmi.



Cant wsit for april to get in on some times....... and even just March so i can put on my light wheels to see the difference there. Wish i had dragy to see 0 to 60 and 1/8th time differences with wheels.


Not sure if im guna end up running a 104 tune at all this year. Scared to break something

[Jake@JHM]

I still am running the stock hx. I really think once your IAT's get a little higher its much harder to make power. There was also a stage 1 manual s4 there also with a stock hx. He could only muster a 13.0. We let our cars cool some between runs, but you have to sit idle for a few mins before launching.

https://jhmotorsports.com/heat-excha...3-0t-4-0t.html

[Audibellybutton]

Honestly I can't really feel when I lose traction at the track because the windows are up and my best gauge is hearing it, but I do know it's slipping some. I already am running 19's.

I still am running the stock hx. I really think once your IAT's get a little higher its much harder to make power. There was also a stage 1 manual s4 there also with a stock hx. He could only muster a 13.0. We let our cars cool some between runs, but you have to sit idle for a few mins before launching.

Is there a way to show your IAT's on the MMI or with some other gauge? I also heard you can get your oil temps on the MMI?

IAT will literally make or break your performance. Lo IAT means more power of course and in most cases if your IAT exceed 70C the ecu will pull timing to help protect components of the car because running at that temp or higher can cause damage. I’ve learned this from chasing down cooling issues that were causing lots of timing pull. If you don’t log your car you probably wouldn’t even notice. Which is bad. For this platform you definitely need to monitor your intake temps

[Audibellybutton]

Stage 1 IE 93 octane BG.SQ5 tcu tune Attachment 159469Attachment 159470Attachment 159471Attachment 159472Attachment 159473Attachment 159474Attachment 159475Attachment 159476Attachment 159477Attachment 159478

Sent from my SM-N950U using Audizine mobile app

Sorry to burst your bubble but your IE stage 1 is not faster than or fast as EPL DP

I think thats common sense but but you were the one bold enough to make that claim so I thought I'd show you.


this was just a run I did in 70F CA weather on 93 octane map. you are posting dragy times in 36F weather... If my car wasn't heat soaked and I had 36F weather it wouldnt even be close.

You have a pretty aggressive stage 1 map and a very good tcu tune. take that props and dont let it go to your head. my car is not even close to being the fastest EPL C7 either
I am DP but I am on a super modest pulley ratio too.

stop hating on epl lol i'm pretty sure IE doesn't need you as a cheerleader

[joe916]

Sorry to burst your bubble but your IE stage 1 is not faster than or fast as EPL DP

I think thats common sense but but you were the one bold enough to make that claim so I thought I'd show you.


this was just a run I did in 70F CA weather on 93 octane map. you are posting dragy times in 36F weather... If my car wasn't heat soaked and I had 36F weather it wouldnt even be close.

You have a pretty aggressive stage 1 map and a very good tcu tune. take that props and dont let it go to your head. my car is not even close to being the fastest EPL C7 either
I am DP but I am on a super modest pulley ratio too.

stop hating on epl lol i'm pretty sure IE doesn't need you as a cheerleader

First of all, this is a basic stage 1 tune off the shelf not a custom tune and second of all am 1-2 mph off your trap speed and weigh around 300-400lbs more with my q5 with 2 car seats in the back There is nothing impressive with your numbers so I don't see what your point is about? The right tune and the right transmission tune will get fast numbers my 1/8 numbers are pretty similar to yours with temps around 60-65 And let me remind you. This is all on stock pulleys and 93 octane Hating on EPL and showing results on the quarter mile list is a different story You can go down the list and see for yourself Who runs the fastest quarter-mile times and who is tuned by them? And no, I'm not sponsored by IE LOL IMG_20200203_134752_199.jpeg

Sent from my SM-N950U using Audizine mobile app

[Audibellybutton]

First of all, this is a basic stage 1 tune off the shelf not a custom tune and second of all am 1-2 mph off your trap speed and weigh around 300-400lbs more with my q5 with 2 car seats in the back There is nothing impressive with your numbers so I don't see what your point is about? The right tune and the right transmission tune will get fast numbers my 1/8 numbers are pretty similar to yours with temps around 60-65 And let me remind you. This is all on stock pulleys and 93 octane Hating on EPL and showing results on the quarter mile list is a different story You can go down the list and see for yourself Who runs the fastest quarter-mile times and who is tuned by them? And no, I'm not sponsored by IE LOL IMG_20200203_134752_199.jpeg

Sent from my SM-N950U using Audizine mobile app

Learn how to read first before replying lmao I clearly said this was done on a 93 octane map. And it was 70F weather. We have the same tcu tune. You over here dickriding because you got a low 12 in 36 degree weather lmao calm down buddy. But like I said, you made a bold statement, you said yours was faster or as fast as EPL DP C7 and well that’s not true lol idk who told you that but they lied to you.. hahaha stop going around calling people out if you don’t want to look dumb. Just take your low 12 and put it on your fridge if you wanna show off but nobody else cares. You’re lucky we didn’t race for pinks. You don’t wanna see me in 36 degree weather and stop bringing up the record holder I don’t care what company holds then record right now, it changes from time to time, never know who will take it next, but regardless there’s way more factors that go into getting a good time than just the tuning company lol everyone knows that... well everyone besides the unsponsored IE cheerleader

[joe916]

Learn how to read first before replying lmao I clearly said this was done on a 93 octane map. And it was 70F weather. We have the same tcu tune. You over here dickriding because you got a low 12 in 36 degree weather lmao calm down buddy. But like I said, you made a bold statement, you said yours was faster or as fast as EPL DP C7 and well that’s not true lol idk who told you that but they lied to you.. hahaha stop going around calling people out if you don’t want to look dumb. Just take your low 12 and put it on your fridge if you wanna show off but nobody else cares. You’re lucky we didn’t race for pinks. You don’t wanna see me in 36 degree weather and stop bringing up the record holder I don’t care what company holds then record right now, it changes from time to time, never know who will take it next, but regardless there’s way more factors that go into getting a good time than just the tuning company lol everyone knows that... well everyone besides the unsponsored IE cheerleader

yes i am pretty close to DP epl guys on 93 never said faster and how am i calling people out? because your numbers are not impressive? and i have plenty of dragy runs in 60+temps all in the 12.3-12.4 range and all in the 110-113mph trap isn't this thread about 1/4 numbers? its not about feelings dont get to emotional here and for the record top 5 fastest a6 are tuned by IE/034/APR nobody is stopping you from getting a dragy and running in the same temp as me it will be interesting to see the more 1/4 runs

[pfar54]

yes i am pretty close to DP epl guys on 93 never said faster and how am i calling people out? because your numbers are not impressive? and i have plenty of dragy runs in 60+temps all in the 12.3-12.4 range and all in the 110-113mph trap isn't this thread about 1/4 numbers? its not about feelings dont get to emotional here and for the record top 5 fastest a6 are tuned by IE/034/APR nobody is stopping you from getting a dragy and running in the same temp as me it will be interesting to see the more 1/4 runs

Dude get out of this thread and troll your own forum sub-section. I used to really enjoy this thread until you started trolling it.

[jrp916]

Sorry to burst your bubble but your IE stage 1 is not faster than or fast as EPL DP

I think thats common sense but but you were the one bold enough to make that claim so I thought I'd show you.


this was just a run I did in 70F CA weather on 93 octane map. you are posting dragy times in 36F weather... If my car wasn't heat soaked and I had 36F weather it wouldnt even be close.

You have a pretty aggressive stage 1 map and a very good tcu tune. take that props and dont let it go to your head. my car is not even close to being the fastest EPL C7 either
I am DP but I am on a super modest pulley ratio too.

stop hating on epl lol i'm pretty sure IE doesn't need you as a cheerleader

Wow you’re over a whole second faster than my apr stage 1 (91), with similar da. With mainly dp and Merc hx as a difference (I think?). I need to get an hx upgrade next. Like that jhm one above.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Audibellybutton]

Wow you’re over a whole second faster than my apr stage 1 (91), with similar da. With mainly dp and Merc hx as a difference (I think?). I need to get an hx upgrade next. Like that jhm one above.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Go for the HX you won’t regret it. And for pulleys if I could do it all over again I would just grab a giant 206mm crankpulley and leave the supercharger pulley stock. It’s easier for if you need to go back to stock for any reason. Also octane does make a big difference. 91 vs 93 is a noticeable difference for me. I will be running e40 or e50 soon once I get an ethanol sensor to monitor the levels properly.

[joe916]

Dude get out of this thread and troll your own forum sub-section. I used to really enjoy this thread until you started trolling it.

Have any 1/4 numbers to speak of? Explain the trolling part?

[pfar54]

Have any 1/4 numbers to speak of? Explain the trolling part?

This.

What about my comment warrants you asking about my 1/4 mile times? You are in a C7 section with a Q5 and keep harassing people and companies. I don't know if you are just psychotically competitive, but it's getting annoying. You ruined a good thread. Nobody cares about your SUV.