
Originally Posted by
VW2Audi25
I wouldn't consider it a compromise. Every car maker changes the concept to something more realistic. I do not like amber myself so if I had to pick, I'd pick the red over the last version that you showed. The first video is more of an animation, which looks cool, but that has nothing to do with the color, but more to do with how the actual animation.
Let me break it down.
The first video at 0:38 of the tail light indicator is the animation (dynamic), color (amber), and type (full LED)
the 2nd video of the A3 sportback is the same as the first video minus the animation (dynamic)
the 3rd video the A3 saloon is the same as the video above it (2nd video) minus the type (full LED)
the US A3 sedan tail light indicators are minus all above,
I'm pissed that the last feature the color (amber) wasn't even provided over. At the very least that should have stayed unchanged from concept. But no.
Edit: I'm only showing the concept video as it shows you the evolution Audi's compromise on the A3 by the time it hit the US, we got the cheapest look of the tail light. It shouldn't have cost them anything to keep the amber lights in the tail light for the turn indicators.
The contrast colors made the car look distinctive when signaling.
How can you chose red when those tiny red indicators will be barely visible above the brake lights?
I think you fold too easy to Audi's compromise.
Bookmarks