
Originally Posted by
redline380
Agreed.
I HATE it when people make the recommendation to change both bearings at the same time. It makes no sense! The other bearing could last for another 10, 20, or 30 thousand miles! You have no idea. And it isn't like adding forged rods to an engine that you have apart. The bearings are completely separate sides and doing them both at the same time will not be cheaper, quicker, or more efficient. The only thing you are doing by changing both at the same time is reducing the amount of mileage you get from a bearing, meaning more money per mile in that bearing. You might as well let it ride until it goes.
Its a 1999, it is cost effective to do both since if it is at a shop they can do both in less time than it takes us to do one in the driveway. It's a 30 minute or less replacement in a shop but you are going to get charged a full hour rate. May as well have both done.
I have a lot more idea than you think. It's called preventative maintenance. This doesn't make sense >> .... " The only thing you are doing by changing both at the same time is reducing the amount of mileage you get from a bearing, meaning more money per mile in that bearing. You might as well let it ride until it goes. " .... considering the fact that it's a 1999.
If you are really crunching the pennies saved on a 16 year old bearing by trying to squeeze a few remaining miles out of it then whatever.
The cost here would be for two bearings and hub and the shop time for 1 visit. The older bearing could last and it may very well not. The latter is more likely that 10,000 more miles isn't gonna happen. Bearings do fail at about the same time and mileage.
But it's the OP's car, suggestion is that doing both saves money but since you and I disagree, it is irrelevant as it is not our car...
Bookmarks