Audizine - An Automotive Enthusiast Community

Results 1 to 21 of 21
  1. #1
    Established Member Two Rings Ginn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 16 2012
    AZ Member #
    105927
    My Garage
    Tacoma
    Location
    Maple Ridge, B.C. Canada

    3.0T Fuel Economy

    Guest-only advertisement. Register or Log In now!
    Hey guy's can you let me know what you're getting with your 3.0T?

    This is what I'm getting and it seams really low. Now before you say "maybe you should lay off the gas" I don't really push my car that much. I'm usually pretty light on the gas.

    2011 3.0t with only 72,000km or 45,000 miles.
    Regularly maintained and just did put in NKG plugs 10,000km's ago.
    I reset my km's every tank and it doesn't matter if I run 91octane or 94octane.
    Drive 70 / 30 city to hwy

    Approx 570km's per tank which works out to 356 miles.
    My car reads 11.4 lt per 100k but I think I'm getting about 14lt per 100k which works out to just under 17mpg.

    I'm riding with ST coilovers and a set of 255 35 19 michelin pilot super sport. Other than that the car is pretty much stock.

    Any helpful suggestions or comments would be appreciated.

    Thanks
    2016 Audi S6 Black S-Line & MK4 R32

    Past
    2011 Audi A6 3.0t
    2007 Ford F-350 King Ranch (Lifted) - 2006 BMW 530i M-Sport
    2002 VW GTI VR6 - 2006 Ducati Monster S2R1000 - 2005 Audi S4 Avant

  2. #2
    Senior Member Three Rings FormulaElement's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 02 2013
    AZ Member #
    118216
    Location
    406, MT

    That seems a little low for a 3.0T, unless your gunning it often! I don't have one to comment but my 4.2 gets better gas mileage than your getting and thats 100% city.
    The DIS always reads more than what your actually getting, you would be the first to have better gas mileage than what its reading!
    Last edited by FormulaElement; 02-08-2015 at 11:17 PM.

  3. #3
    Veteran Member Four Rings ichi d's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 10 2013
    AZ Member #
    114947
    Location
    Toronto,ON

    i get about 500km or 550 if i push it till the gas light comes on with 60/40 city driving. on 91oct.
    fomulaelement if you saying thats low already i would love to see what other members are getting.
    C7 S6 / AWE Touring / -14mm / EuroTails /

  4. #4
    Veteran Member Four Rings B-Time's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 03 2009
    AZ Member #
    42009
    Location
    East

    To get a better number, calculate it manually, or http://www.calculator.net/gas-mileage-calculator.html#

  5. #5
    Established Member Two Rings snowzach's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 25 2004
    AZ Member #
    2254
    Location
    Columbus, OH

    2010 checking in... I've only had mine about 2 months but I've run about 5-6 tanks through it... I get almost exactly 20mpg (calculate manually every tank). I would say about 60/40 highway/city.

    I actually work with a guy who has either 2011-2012. He does a lot of highway driving and said he averages 21.6 according to the computer.

  6. #6
    Senior Member Two Rings
    Join Date
    Jan 30 2014
    AZ Member #
    141876
    My Garage
    1st gen Q45s
    Location
    FL, USA

    Quote Originally Posted by snowzach View Post
    I actually work with a guy who has either 2011-2012.
    2011=C6.5
    2012=C7
    even if both 3.0R engines, the C7 has an 8 speed box vs. our 6 speeds on the C6.5

    On my 3.0R, in 7900 miles since purchase, worst 23.5, best 25.5 80%hwy, 20% city on average. I hand calculate every time. At least 1 redline every tank full. DIS reads 3-5% optimistic.

  7. #7
    Veteran Member Four Rings IanCH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 12 2013
    AZ Member #
    109430
    Location
    Boston, MA

    basically get 17-18 on my S4.... would expect the same out of the A6.
    Current: '25 BMW M240i xDrive - '22 MDX Type S

    Previous: '20 GTI, '18 Q5, '18 S5 SB, '15 Golf R, '11 S4, '08 S6

    "I'm the one person on Audizine who cares about engineering." - westwest888

  8. #8
    Established Member Two Rings Ginn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 16 2012
    AZ Member #
    105927
    My Garage
    Tacoma
    Location
    Maple Ridge, B.C. Canada

    I reset my odometer every full tank and check my km's vs litres added to tank. I'm getting an average of 17mpg. That just seams low.
    Anyone else?
    2016 Audi S6 Black S-Line & MK4 R32

    Past
    2011 Audi A6 3.0t
    2007 Ford F-350 King Ranch (Lifted) - 2006 BMW 530i M-Sport
    2002 VW GTI VR6 - 2006 Ducati Monster S2R1000 - 2005 Audi S4 Avant

  9. #9
    Veteran Member Four Rings q5 dave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 15 2014
    AZ Member #
    303164
    My Garage
    2016 F250, 2018 Q3
    Location
    driving

    im averaging 21mpg recently with alot of mixed driving in my q5
    2013 Q5 3.0T Phantom Black
    1998 A4 1.8T Laser Red, Quattro, 5 speed manual

  10. #10
    Veteran Member Four Rings ichi d's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 10 2013
    AZ Member #
    114947
    Location
    Toronto,ON

    does anyone know if carbon build up could hurt mpg?
    C7 S6 / AWE Touring / -14mm / EuroTails /

  11. #11
    Veteran Member Four Rings Dutch_A6's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 19 2012
    AZ Member #
    98923
    My Garage
    GMC Terrain
    Location
    Belleville, IL

    It can if it is bad enough, I saw my mpg go up on average by 3mpg after I had it done last year. But I have the 3.2L not the 3.0t, I'm not sure how bad the carbon buildup issue are for the supercharged engines.
    Black 2012 A7 Prestige

    Zito ZF01 wheels
    EPL stage 2 tune
    Tinted marker lights
    Roc Euro intake
    AWE touring exhaust
    APR CPS

  12. #12
    Veteran Member Three Rings
    Join Date
    Feb 06 2013
    AZ Member #
    109039
    Location
    CA

    Quote Originally Posted by ichi d View Post
    does anyone know if carbon build up could hurt mpg?
    Carbon build up will impact your mpg, but the 3.0T is not susceptible to carbon build up, unlike the FSI engines (3.2, and 07-09 4.2).

    Here's a write-up a did on carbon build-up a little while back.

    Things that have a direct impact on carbon deposits are:
    - Fuel quality: The crappier the fuel, the more impurities and the more likely there are to be deposits to collect - go to http://www.toptiergas.com/ for more info
    - Driving distance/engine temps: Those hit hardest are short distance driving, where the engine never gets up to temp. Getting the engine hot means that the gunk won’t be able to collect as readily, because it’s baked off by the high temps.
    - Poor seating of the cylinder rings: More oil seeps by into the fuel adding to the large amounts of particles recirculated into the intakes. Use of more than 1Qt of oil every 5K miles means higher than average oil consumption usually meaning poorly seated rings, causing excessive blow-by

    So all C6 3.2 engines are DI (Audi calls it FSI), they are the first OEM to make ALL their engines this way. DI is really great for making the fuel/air mix ratios and concentrations perfect, it takes less fuel to make the right mix with DI, it takes less fuel to get the same power using DI, and it can also fight knock (pre-ignition, which harms engines) since every injector can operate independently – allowing the ECU to control the fuel to every cylinder individually. It is also used if the engine gets too hot and the coolant cannot keep up by purposefully putting extra fuel in which will evaporate harmlessly but take heat with it. Here comes the con(s).

    Non-DI engines have the injectors in the intake channels, and spray the intake valve’s backing as it opens into the cylinder. This happens with each intake stroke, “washing” the intake valve with fuel. You have, I am sure, seen the Chevron with Techron and like commercials about it having additives which keep valves clean. This is great for NON-DI engines. Why the valves need cleaning is due to 1970’s legislation to handle pollution. Exhaust Gas Recirculation (EGR) and Positive Crankcase Ventilation (PCV) are 2 things required by law in the US (and many other countries) to prevent pollution. EGR pipes unburned fuel and particles in the exhaust, back into the crankcase to prevent catalytic convertor congestion and failure (things like unburned fuel, impurities in the fuel, water vapor, CO2, and oil). PCV takes crankcase vapors (mainly just oil particles and the EGR stuff) which is under pressure and pre-1970’s was just vented to the atmosphere, but now is redirected through a valve system which has a rough collection system that attempts to pull the largest particles from the air in this, and separate them out and allow them to drip down into the oil filter to be collected (if bad) or allowed to be cleaned and returned to the oil pan for engine lubrication – the particles too small to collect are mixed with fresh air coming into the engine just above the intake valves and shot back into the engine to attempt to re-burn them properly.

    As you can imagine, the particles will collect on all parts of the intake, turning into sludge eventually and oozing into the intake, where it eventually is burned away during combustion. The problem happens with DI engines – the injectors shoot fuel DIRECTLY into the cylinders and don’t wash this gunk off the back of the intake valves. As such the gunk builds up here but since it’s so close to the cylinder, the heat bakes the gunk into carbon deposits which build up slowly over time. These deposits eventually become so heavy that they affect the airflow into the cylinders, making them move in unexpected patterns, or in very bad cases, not enough air is pulled in as the ECU is expecting, either way the result is too much fuel to the air ratio, or uneven mixing of the fuel, which robs engine power, can cause rough idle, and eventually cause Check Engine Lights (CEL’s) due to misfires (especially when the engine is cold). This causes a negative spiral, where the even higher amounts of unburned fuel due to the Carbon Build-up (CB) makes even more unburned fuel be re-circulated and these richer deposits speed the buildup on the backs of the valves further.

    A few things are done by people to correct this.
    - Carbon Cleaning – the top of the engine is pulled apart, intakes and valve covers are pulled, and the heads removed, then a Dremel or similar tool is used with a fine grain grinding bit are used to grind the carbon off the intake runners, the intake air flaps, and the backs of the valves. This is usually done around every 30K miles by those wanting to be sure they have the power and performance of the car unaffected.
    - Catch Can – This is a 3rd party development, which partially bypasses the EPA mandated pollution measures mentioned above. It basically goes in-line with the recirculation of the gases before they hit the intake, comprising of a separate filter system that more aggressively captures and holds the particles the stock system doesn’t handle. The difference here is that the aftermarket solution doesn’t drop this into the oil, it holds it in the can, and you have a drain at the bottom where every 5-7K miles it needs emptying. Due to this being “bad stuff” from inside the engine, it cannot be disposed of easily, and is best poured into old oil containers and taken to a recycling place like Schuck’s or your local recycling transfer station, it’s mainly oil, water and fuel, so it can go into oil recycling.
    - Methanol Injection – Typically referred to as “Meth” it’s been around a LOT longer than the illicit drug, and is basically a raw form of octane. What it’s used for is to both cool the incoming air (making it denser and therefore holds more oxygen for combustion) as well as boost the octane rating, which equates to more power. Methanol is mixed 50/50 with distilled water, and uses a special tank to hold it in, with its own pump and delivery system. The methanol is injected into the air intake around the throttle body, misting the incoming air. The methanol mist in the air cools it through evaporation, and since it’s a combustible liquid, it helps take place of the washing that non-DI engines get, by coating the backs of the valves and pulls the deposits into the fuel system rather than it baking and hardening there, as well as giving more horsepower and performance out of the car at the same time. Methanol is not very expensive, but is dangerous due to high octane and ability to burn, hence mixing 50/50. A typical use system will go through a small (1 liter) tank every 1-2 tanks of gas.

    One of the things is that Forced Induction (FI) engines (3.0T) are not as susceptible to this, the reason being the much higher compression and thus higher cylinder and valve temps if you do get it out and run it for at least 10-20 minutes at normal running temps.

  13. #13
    Veteran Member Three Rings
    Join Date
    Feb 06 2013
    AZ Member #
    109039
    Location
    CA

    Quote Originally Posted by Ginn View Post
    Hey guy's can you let me know what you're getting with your 3.0T?

    This is what I'm getting and it seams really low. Now before you say "maybe you should lay off the gas" I don't really push my car that much. I'm usually pretty light on the gas.

    2011 3.0t with only 72,000km or 45,000 miles.
    Regularly maintained and just did put in NKG plugs 10,000km's ago.
    I reset my km's every tank and it doesn't matter if I run 91octane or 94octane.
    Drive 70 / 30 city to hwy

    Approx 570km's per tank which works out to 356 miles.
    My car reads 11.4 lt per 100k but I think I'm getting about 14lt per 100k which works out to just under 17mpg.

    I'm riding with ST coilovers and a set of 255 35 19 michelin pilot super sport. Other than that the car is pretty much stock.

    Any helpful suggestions or comments would be appreciated.

    Thanks
    Sorry to hear about the poor mileage and that really is poor. Heck you're getting about what my buddy who has a C7 S6 and a HEAVY foot gets! 17mpg is definitely on the low end for the 3.0T. A tune-up should be in order, check for good spark, ignition coils all being clean and working at high efficiency, is your air filter good? The things that impact mileage from an engine perspective are your ignition, gas, and air...so check all your filters (air, fuel), and make sure you have no impediment that is blocking either of those.

  14. #14
    Established Member Two Rings
    Join Date
    Sep 11 2014
    AZ Member #
    281972
    Location
    Phoenix

    According to the MFD I sit right around 21.1mpg. And I do mostly city driving.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Current DD - 2015 Golf R #333

    Prior - 1990 Volvo 740, 1996 Volvo 850, 2004 Volvo S40, 2004 Volvo V70R, 2007 Volkswagen GLI, 2010 A6 Avant 3.0T, 2014 Subaru Forester XT

  15. #15
    Senior Member Three Rings dluxxx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 13 2013
    AZ Member #
    111326
    My Garage
    2016 Porsche Cayenne Diesel
    Location
    Nor*Cal

    i get around 17-18 too... 2010 3.0t w/ around 42k miles. i do alot of city driving and alot of it is in traffic so thats why i think mine is so low.
    2010 A6 C6.5 3.0T, Remus Mufflers w/ Quad tips, Magnaflow Resonated X-Pipe, RocEuro Intake, EPL Stage 1, Transparent Gloss Copper Verde Axis V99 20x9, Michelin Pilot Sport 4S 265/30, Bilstein P14 PSS Coilover, H&R Rear Sway Bar, Ultra Racing Front Lower Brace, Ultra Racing Center Lower Brace, RS6 Black Gloss Grill, Rear diffuser, Black Vinyl window trim, Smoked Rear Tailights, Complete Interior LED Lights, Blacked out front sidemarkers, Morimoto 5000k D3S bulbs, SB3 Alpha Ceramic Coating.

  16. #16
    Established Member Two Rings snokarver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 30 2009
    AZ Member #
    41895
    Location
    Seattle

    2009 avant with 91k, I've had it for 10k. With probably 60/40 city/hwy we average around 22-23. On the highway, doing 70, I can get 30 :) My last tank was the first one below 20mpg average, and I'm not sure why. 17mpg overall average seems pretty low.

  17. #17
    Established Member Two Rings Ginn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 16 2012
    AZ Member #
    105927
    My Garage
    Tacoma
    Location
    Maple Ridge, B.C. Canada

    Ok.... tomorrow it starts. Fuel Filter and start checking everything.
    2016 Audi S6 Black S-Line & MK4 R32

    Past
    2011 Audi A6 3.0t
    2007 Ford F-350 King Ranch (Lifted) - 2006 BMW 530i M-Sport
    2002 VW GTI VR6 - 2006 Ducati Monster S2R1000 - 2005 Audi S4 Avant

  18. #18
    Veteran Member Four Rings ichi d's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 10 2013
    AZ Member #
    114947
    Location
    Toronto,ON

    let me know if any of that works. i changed my plugs and did the air and fuel filter and seen no gains. but then again im stage 2.
    C7 S6 / AWE Touring / -14mm / EuroTails /

  19. #19
    Established Member Two Rings snowzach's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 25 2004
    AZ Member #
    2254
    Location
    Columbus, OH

    If your foot is in it more than not and you're usually in Sport or Tiptronic mode, 17 does not surprise me at all. I don't know that I would panic over it and throw a bunch of parts at the car. Short trips would definitely cause low MPG as well. The car usually runs rich at first and pumps air into the catalytic converts to heat them up faster when it's cold.

    Have we heard for sure that the 3.0t is not susceptible to the carbon caking on the valves? I have heard it's less of an issue. I would love to hear that it never happens though. Just curious.

  20. #20
    Veteran Member Three Rings
    Join Date
    Feb 06 2013
    AZ Member #
    109039
    Location
    CA

    Quote Originally Posted by snowzach View Post
    If your foot is in it more than not and you're usually in Sport or Tiptronic mode, 17 does not surprise me at all. I don't know that I would panic over it and throw a bunch of parts at the car. Short trips would definitely cause low MPG as well. The car usually runs rich at first and pumps air into the catalytic converts to heat them up faster when it's cold.

    Have we heard for sure that the 3.0t is not susceptible to the carbon caking on the valves? I have heard it's less of an issue. I would love to hear that it never happens though. Just curious.
    Hi snowzach, as I mentioned earlier, Forced Induction (FI) engines (3.0T) are not as susceptible to carbon caking, since they have a much higher compression and thus higher cylinder and valve temps...however you NEED to get it out and running for at least 10-20 minutes at normal running temps. Therefore, prolonged short runs with the car, can cause the carbon buildup akin to the other direct injection engines.

  21. #21
    Veteran Member Three Rings MainlandMig's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 06 2010
    AZ Member #
    57268
    Location
    Atlantic City Metro Area

    Been using an MPG tracker app n never missed an entry at fill up
    apr stg 2 93
    I fill up Sam's club premium
    18.42 avg
    W heavy city driving lots of stop go n run idle I've dipped down approx 16
    2011 A6 (C6/4F) 3.0 SC Q Prestige | Brilliant Black | Amaretto/Black Leather Walnut Trim | Side Assist
    APR Stage 2 | USP Motorsports Intake | ST Coilovers | StopTech Slotted w Hawk HPS | H&R F&R Sway Bars| B8S4 19 Tri-Spokes/Peelers
    Tints 50% FD, 35% RD, 20% C-pillar & Rear | Under Seat Drawers | 3M Glossy Black Side Markers

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  


    © 2001-2025 Audizine, Audizine.com, and Driverzines.com
    Audizine is an independently owned and operated automotive enthusiast community and news website.
    Audi and the Audi logo(s) are copyright/trademark Audi AG. Audizine is not endorsed by or affiliated with Audi AG.