
Originally Posted by
SFV A4
It will run on lesser fuel, but at reduced performance and possibly lower mpg's. Not worth it in my opinion. Could also run the risk of carbon build-up/clogging/fouling as the miles pile on years from now.
How do you explain the Jetta's equal power and fuel economy on regular unleaded? Also, carbon build up isn't an octane issue from my understanding of the issue.

Originally Posted by
AUDITOPGUN
Yes 91 my ex ran 89 on our old A3 and at 90k miles the car died on us open the engine and it was not pretty black gunk all over pistons $700 to fix
Sounds more than just a fuel issue based on Westlake's post.

Originally Posted by
Westlake
Easiest way to find out what's required is to read the manual. My 2005 A4's manual says 91 octane is recommended, but not required. I've been using 87 for years. 125K miles and no fuel problems.
Yes, I read the manual. I'm now curious if the recommended premium fuel is just a marketing scheme.

Originally Posted by
LINDW4LL
I'd just run it, although I'm not sure if it's required or not; I'd certainly assume so. Turbo engines usually require premium fuel, and run better on them as well.
Premium is about ~ $2.60-$3.00 more per tank on average than regular. That's approximately $150 a year if you drive 370 miles a week, which is likely more than average. Hardly worth worrying about.
I had thought the same about turbo engines until I filled the tank on the Jetta. $150/yr isn't much but it's a nice night out on the town.
Bookmarks