
Originally Posted by
GrapeBandit
^are our plastic slaves prone to failure? ive never had to replace a slave on any of the 4 b5's ive owned in the past 14yrs
No, not really. But much of the reason for switching to this slave is just a 'pursuit of metal parts' and not so much a real performance difference. People are changing the slave and line. It would follow that persons would also be interested in changing the plastic master, but such is not the case for whatever reason. Probably lack of visibility and accessibility of the parts. Perhaps also a lack of pioneers to show the way and describe the imagined benefits.

Originally Posted by
revbjeff
From what I've read I believe my car (97 1.8tQM) came stock with the metal slave cylinder. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
If the car has a plastic slave, it also has a plastic master. The vin-split for the parts is the same. So you either have both metal or both plastic, unless you modify something.

Originally Posted by
revbjeff
To do it the "cheap" way I would just disconnect the line from the slave cylinder, add the 3/16" compression fittings for the slave side, flare the end of the line and screw it back onto the slave cylinder?
I flared a short new section of line with the 12x1.25 nut to connect to the metal slave. Then used a compression union to join the A4 line to my new piece. I was using this slave, which requires a bit of added length:
http://www.ecstuning.com/Search/Site...21_261/ES1453/
If you are using a slave that looks like
this, it has a sort of extension that comes with it. So you can probably get away without adding any line at all. Just cut off the barb fitting and flare the line. All you need is the 12x1.25 line nut. My slave was used and came with the nut, but if yours is new, you'll have to buy one.
Bookmarks