
Originally Posted by
westwest888
This is complete bullshit. I've run my Revo car in 107 degree desert sun, on a racetrack for an entire day, and had zero knocks.
I think based on the 1/4 mile performance numbers that Revo's tune is actually extremely conservative, just as its sister tune Stasis is. This means that if you are a power user like me, you can do 500 4th gear pulls on a racetrack in an afternoon and get very consistent performance. If you want to do 1 super fast pull on the street, there's other tuners that will get you there in 12 seconds flat if you don't mind ruining your clutch.
I've run all 3 of the REVO programs - 91, 93, and 100 - and honestly I don't really notice any perceptible difference between them. Tuning the car seems to only really have an affect from 5200 RPM to redline.
The only fact that an objective person reading the board must agree with is that either your tune puts down the fastest time, or maximizes engine and drivetrain safety. You can't have both, they are direct, proportional tradeoffs. If you put down an 11.5, fast AND not safe. If you put down a 12.9, safe AND not fast.
There is more than enough evidence through logs, etc. to back up what I'm saying. Oh, and your 1/4 mi times mean absolute shit, as was proven in the threads where you posted them and graced us all with your superior expertise as a software engineer

.
BTW, APR S2 and GIAC S2 are both faster and safer than Revo because THEY DON'T ALTER THE FACTORY ENGINE PROTECTION from knock, overboost, etc.
So in summary, which part of the following are bullshit? Please, show logs if you disagree.
a) Revo alters factory knock sensitivity. APR and GIAC do not.
b) Revo sets requested boost to unobtainable levels in a hackjob quick and dirty effort to obtain maximum boost. APR and GIAC do not.
c) Revo runs more advanced timing than APR or GIAC and does so with altered factory knock sensitivity mentioned in a).
Bookmarks