I can tell you that whereas the Haldex set up is obviously not true quattro, there is a bit of user involvement to discern the differences. If you very much so pay attention to your car, and push it outside of its traction range frequently enough to identify what is happening at each corner, then yes, you absolutely will notice that the Haldex is not the same.
quattro is mechanical- it is predictable and always engaged and there. In the snow, intentionally blasting around and sliding, there is no better
In daily driving, commuting, stop and go crappy winter traffic? The haldex would be fine.
The latest generation of Haldex definitely makes up for the short comings of the prior generations. MkV R32's (in my opinion) were some of the worst examples of Haldex in lost-traction situations. The car would understeer like mad (while in FWD mode) and then, when the ecu realized it was slipping, would dump power to the back, thus (likely) slipping the rear tires, inducing oversteer and rotation, which just led to hating everything once you started to slide.
A friend of mine with one phrased it as
"Well, so, you're about to come in hot and you know it, and then the front end is like 'lets hit the outside curb!!! and then the tail end is like, no lets hit that tree over there, backwards! But then they compromise and do both."
I've got a new golf R, with the new haldex, and it is miles better. It senses the potential for slip before it happens, and softly adds proper power to the rear wheels. With a little driver input, you can set the tail out lightly around a corner.
Plus, there's software for the haldex that can bias it RWD or have various set ups.
Is the wife a drift machine? No? She's gonna love the TT.
Bookmarks