Audizine - An Automotive Enthusiast Community

Results 1 to 23 of 23
  1. #1
    Veteran Member Four Rings BITRBO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 08 2007
    AZ Member #
    16235
    Location
    Mr. Worl-Wye

    anyone have a built 3.2L TT??

    Guest-only advertisement. Register or Log In now!
    The old man just got an '05 TT S-Line w/ the 3.2L, and he wants a little more power out of the engine. I searched the archives but didn't really find much. I know the most popular solution is an F/I kit, but we want to stay N/A. Just looking for a solid 300hp or better, which I'm sure totally possible with some head work and upgraded interternals.

    Any help/direction would be greatly appreciated.

    TIA!
    '13 C63 AMG -
    '14 Tiguan - sold
    '09 JSW - sold
    '04 GTI - sold
    '01 S4 - sold

  2. #2
    Veteran Member Four Rings
    Join Date
    Apr 05 2009
    AZ Member #
    40781
    My Garage
    1984 Audi 4000S Quattro, 1989 Toyota MR2 SC, 1960 Alfa Spider
    Location
    SF BayArea

    Re: anyone have a built 3.2L TT??

    from what I have seen at the various forums, the 6 cylinder non turbo Audi engines are not easy to coax more power out of in any way that makes sense, besides an exhaust and intake and a few more hP from a software flash, not much else you can do. You can probably get it up to 275HP-280 with the Revo chip listed below, an intake, and a full exhaust.

    http://www.revotechnik.com/products/....aspx?pvID=634


    Its not like the old days where you port the heads, do cams, etc. If you go that route, then you need custom software to run it as well.

  3. #3
    Veteran Member Four Rings BITRBO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 08 2007
    AZ Member #
    16235
    Location
    Mr. Worl-Wye

    Re: anyone have a built 3.2L TT??

    That's strange.... From what I've read the VR6 is definitely a solid engine, and can handle high-boost applications pretty well. That tells me that there is meat on the block, probably enough to bore it at least 0.2 over on the cylinders. That with some nice high-compression pistons, port & polished heads, a better cam w/ upgrade valves, and a custom tune to wrap it up. Essentially it'd be a VR6 on 'roids, but still nothing crazy... Just a nice high-reving little V6, with about 300-350CHP.
    '13 C63 AMG -
    '14 Tiguan - sold
    '09 JSW - sold
    '04 GTI - sold
    '01 S4 - sold

  4. #4
    Veteran Member Four Rings
    Join Date
    Apr 05 2009
    AZ Member #
    40781
    My Garage
    1984 Audi 4000S Quattro, 1989 Toyota MR2 SC, 1960 Alfa Spider
    Location
    SF BayArea

    Re: anyone have a built 3.2L TT??

    I think the issue is it already has high compression pistons and a a fairly aggressive cam.

  5. #5
    Senior Member Three Rings HardPark'd TT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 18 2007
    AZ Member #
    17396
    My Garage
    w202
    Location
    Central Coast

    Re: anyone have a built 3.2L TT??

    Quote Originally Posted by onlyaudis View Post
    I think the issue is it already has high compression pistons and a a fairly aggressive cam.
    Same dilemma in the e46 m3 world. HPF blew motor after motor until they got it right.
    EURO.TECHNIKS
    www.eurotechniks.info

  6. #6
    Veteran Member Four Rings chrislane31's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 24 2007
    AZ Member #
    16688
    Location
    CT

    Re: anyone have a built 3.2L TT??

    Search for HPA, lmk I can get a deal on their stuff

  7. #7
    Veteran Member Four Rings Sandeman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 15 2009
    AZ Member #
    38735
    My Garage
    2003 MB SL500
    Location
    where the horseman roams

    Re: anyone have a built 3.2L TT??

    HPA has built a TwinTurbo TT... major HP that puts out!

    as for bolt ons:
    exhaust, well get rid of the cats and confront over populated muffler design..Cams are a great way aswell...intake and software

  8. #8
    Veteran Member Four Rings BITRBO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 08 2007
    AZ Member #
    16235
    Location
    Mr. Worl-Wye

    Okay, so we're most likely looking at going with bolt-on's, and here is the breakdown:

    REVO / GIAC ECU Software: ~$350
    REVO / GIAC TCU Software: ~$550
    Cams (24V VR6 – 264*/260*): ~$795
    Milltek Cat-Back Exhaust: $999
    Milltek HiFlow Cat Assembly: $1399
    Cold-Air Intake: $299

    Total Cost = ~$4,400k
    Total Power = 285-290CHP (maybe 300CHP); ~250WHP
    Dollar-to-Power Ratio = ~$110/HP


    Do these numbers/assumptions sound about right? And can someone with a 3.2-equipped TT tell me if they feel the cost was worth the 40-50 extra HP?

    TIA!
    Last edited by BITRBO; 02-12-2010 at 09:11 AM.
    '13 C63 AMG -
    '14 Tiguan - sold
    '09 JSW - sold
    '04 GTI - sold
    '01 S4 - sold

  9. #9
    Veteran Member Four Rings BITRBO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 08 2007
    AZ Member #
    16235
    Location
    Mr. Worl-Wye

    Just thinking kinda crazy, "outside the box" here: Does anyone think it would be possible (read: not exorbitantly expensive or difficult) to swap a 3.6L FSI engine from a Passat or Touareg? These are rated at 290/300hp I think, and one can probably be found fairly cheap at a junk yard (certainly less than $4,400....) The obvious concern would be if engine actually fit in the car and the AT would match up. A custom exhaust and tune would obviously be required...

    Discuss
    '13 C63 AMG -
    '14 Tiguan - sold
    '09 JSW - sold
    '04 GTI - sold
    '01 S4 - sold

  10. #10
    Veteran Member Four Rings Mantvis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 05 2009
    AZ Member #
    43375
    My Garage
    mk1 Audi TT 180hp, mk1 Audi TT 225hp, mk4 VW GTI
    Location
    Chicago, Naperville

    Quote Originally Posted by BITRBO View Post
    Just thinking kinda crazy, "outside the box" here: Does anyone think it would be possible (read: not exorbitantly expensive or difficult) to swap a 3.6L FSI engine from a Passat or Touareg? These are rated at 290/300hp I think, and one can probably be found fairly cheap at a junk yard (certainly less than $4,400....) The obvious concern would be if engine actually fit in the car and the AT would match up. A custom exhaust and tune would obviously be required...

    Discuss
    to swap engines LEGALY it has to be from the same chasis
    If you don't need both hands on the wheel, then you're NOT driving.

  11. #11
    Veteran Member Four Rings BITRBO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 08 2007
    AZ Member #
    16235
    Location
    Mr. Worl-Wye

    huh? you mean "legally" with regards to the United States government, or with VW/Audi? And even then, motor swaps are done all the time... USP is running a turbo'd VR6 in their B5 S4, and those cars never came with a VR6 motor.
    '13 C63 AMG -
    '14 Tiguan - sold
    '09 JSW - sold
    '04 GTI - sold
    '01 S4 - sold

  12. #12
    Senior Member Two Rings Brentmeister7592's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 22 2008
    AZ Member #
    34491
    My Garage
    2008 2.0T Audi TT
    Location
    Most likely my Car/Work/School

    Quote Originally Posted by BITRBO View Post
    huh? you mean "legally" with regards to the United States government, or with VW/Audi? And even then, motor swaps are done all the time... USP is running a turbo'd VR6 in their B5 S4, and those cars never came with a VR6 motor.
    Well that VR6 motor is from their VR6 jetta that they have sitting in the showroom. You have to remember that it is a shop car so the money wasn't really an issue. Therefore, they were able to put such a motor in that car. As far as the legality of the motor, I think he is talking about it in the "car world" terms.
    2008 MK2 TT 2.0T

    Mods: APR stage II, Custom 3" DP, Custom 2.5" cat-back, H&R Sport Springs, Porsche Double Oval Exhaust Tips, Neuspeed Intake, Forge DV, Defi Boost gauge, 6000k HID, Yellow Fogs.

  13. #13
    Veteran Member Three Rings diabolical1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 24 2009
    AZ Member #
    40293
    Location
    New York and Toronto

    Quote Originally Posted by BITRBO View Post
    Just thinking kinda crazy, "outside the box" here: Does anyone think it would be possible (read: not exorbitantly expensive or difficult) to swap a 3.6L FSI engine from a Passat or Touareg? These are rated at 290/300hp I think, and one can probably be found fairly cheap at a junk yard (certainly less than $4,400....) The obvious concern would be if engine actually fit in the car and the AT would match up. A custom exhaust and tune would obviously be required...

    Discuss
    possible? sure, but aren't those engines longitudinally mounted? i would suspect, at the least, mounting would pose a hurdle. i think you should stick to your original plan with the bolt-ons. if it were me, i'd probably invest in a port job instead of the top dollar exhaust, and simply buy the parts (collectors tubings, race cats, etc.) and have an exhaust system custom built for me. if at the end of it all you still feel you want more, then build the bottom end for more displacement.
    Because S4 = Hooker
    Both can be purchased for cheap, and after one night of reckless, risky fun, either can be found lifeless on the side of the road. Your family is disappointed and concerned once they find out you've picked one up. Not to mention you try to hide how much money you routinely give one from your significant other.
    - getslideways

  14. #14
    Veteran Member Four Rings Sandeman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 15 2009
    AZ Member #
    38735
    My Garage
    2003 MB SL500
    Location
    where the horseman roams

    Quote Originally Posted by Brentmeister759 View Post
    Well that VR6 motor is from their VR6 jetta that they have sitting in the showroom. You have to remember that it is a shop car so the money wasn't really an issue. Therefore, they were able to put such a motor in that car. As far as the legality of the motor, I think he is talking about it in the "car world" terms.
    not to mention as well, that the internals of that Jetta VR6 is a 12v NOT a 24v as available in the MK1 & MK2 TT 3.2L. so therefore the internals are most def different.
    The layout of the motor is a huge difference as well when youre comparing them, our 3.2 VR6 lays transverse, while the one in the b5 lays longitudinal.

  15. #15
    Veteran Member Three Rings diabolical1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 24 2009
    AZ Member #
    40293
    Location
    New York and Toronto

    Quote Originally Posted by TTMK2_TJ View Post
    The layout of the motor is a huge difference as well when youre comparing them, our 3.2 VR6 lays transverse, while the one in the b5 lays longitudinal.
    from what i understand, that's the issue with mounting them. even though, the engine is longitudinally mounted in the B5, it was transversally mounted in the Jetta. there is no provision for the right- (if i recall) side mount, so one has to get creative to mount one in a B5, and that is what i was alluding to with the suggestion of mounting a Passat or Touareg engine in a TT. i mean, i understand, that it's sort of opposite in this case because you have a mounting point present, but fabrication may be necessary. it's just a point to consider.
    Because S4 = Hooker
    Both can be purchased for cheap, and after one night of reckless, risky fun, either can be found lifeless on the side of the road. Your family is disappointed and concerned once they find out you've picked one up. Not to mention you try to hide how much money you routinely give one from your significant other.
    - getslideways

  16. #16
    Senior Member Two Rings Brentmeister7592's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 22 2008
    AZ Member #
    34491
    My Garage
    2008 2.0T Audi TT
    Location
    Most likely my Car/Work/School

    Quote Originally Posted by TTMK2_TJ View Post
    not to mention as well, that the internals of that Jetta VR6 is a 12v NOT a 24v as available in the MK1 & MK2 TT 3.2L. so therefore the internals are most def different.
    The layout of the motor is a huge difference as well when youre comparing them, our 3.2 VR6 lays transverse, while the one in the b5 lays longitudinal.
    Yes, they are very different. I have spent alot of time with all the guys at the shop and alot of time next to the car. Its a totally different motor then the "new" 3.2 that they use in our cars. But I hope someone can come up with a build on the "new" 3.2. If you can't find it on our audi, im sure you can find it on a R32.
    2008 MK2 TT 2.0T

    Mods: APR stage II, Custom 3" DP, Custom 2.5" cat-back, H&R Sport Springs, Porsche Double Oval Exhaust Tips, Neuspeed Intake, Forge DV, Defi Boost gauge, 6000k HID, Yellow Fogs.

  17. #17
    Stage 3 Forum Advertiser Four Rings 034Motorsport's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 17 2005
    AZ Member #
    7998
    Location
    Fremont, California

    It's going to be very pricey to build a powerful NA 24V VR6...

    Add a turbo to the mix, and you're in for a treat.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YOoLp...layer_embedded

    This engine is longitudinally mounted in a B5 chassis using our mounts, flywheel, starter, and a number of in-house fabricated items, but you get the idea.

    A GT35R is a perfectly sized turbo for a 3.2L 24V on stock internals, and there are a few companies now that provide chip tuning solutions for turbocharged cars still running the factory ECU.
    034Motorsport - Engineering and Manufacturing Performance Hardware & Software Upgrades for Audi Enthusiasts Since 2005.

    YouTube // Instagram // Facebook

  18. #18
    Stage 3 Forum Advertiser Four Rings 034Motorsport's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 17 2005
    AZ Member #
    7998
    Location
    Fremont, California

    Quote Originally Posted by BITRBO View Post
    Just thinking kinda crazy, "outside the box" here: Does anyone think it would be possible (read: not exorbitantly expensive or difficult) to swap a 3.6L FSI engine from a Passat or Touareg? These are rated at 290/300hp I think, and one can probably be found fairly cheap at a junk yard (certainly less than $4,400....) The obvious concern would be if engine actually fit in the car and the AT would match up. A custom exhaust and tune would obviously be required...

    Discuss
    We actually just tuned a Mk4 Jetta which had a 3.6L bottom end, modified to accept the R32/3.2L TT head. This allows you to keep the existing ME7 harness and ECU that comes with your car.

    Converting to the FSI 3.6L head, direct injection fueling, and ME9 ECU from the Touareg would be a nightmare.

    Here's a dyno of the car, it also had a full exhaust and Techtonics 24V cams:



    As you can see, it makes a ton more power than the 3.2L 24V everywhere.
    034Motorsport - Engineering and Manufacturing Performance Hardware & Software Upgrades for Audi Enthusiasts Since 2005.

    YouTube // Instagram // Facebook

  19. #19
    Veteran Member Four Rings Sandeman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 15 2009
    AZ Member #
    38735
    My Garage
    2003 MB SL500
    Location
    where the horseman roams

    Quote Originally Posted by Brentmeister759 View Post
    Yes, they are very different. I have spent alot of time with all the guys at the shop and alot of time next to the car. Its a totally different motor then the "new" 3.2 that they use in our cars. But I hope someone can come up with a build on the "new" 3.2. If you can't find it on our audi, im sure you can find it on a R32.
    there was someone going to turbo our VR6 24v, BUT the car was involved in a car accident that ending up being a total loss, thus the shop ended up giving up on the build... if i remember it correctly, it was a blue mk2 3.2 coupe, front filler plate, 19" optional OE wheels...

  20. #20
    Veteran Member Three Rings diabolical1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 24 2009
    AZ Member #
    40293
    Location
    New York and Toronto

    Quote Originally Posted by Laszlo@034 View Post
    We actually just tuned a Mk4 Jetta which had a 3.6L bottom end, modified to accept the R32/3.2L TT head. This allows you to keep the existing ME7 harness and ECU that comes with your car.
    how involved was the physical mounting of the block to the Jetta?
    Because S4 = Hooker
    Both can be purchased for cheap, and after one night of reckless, risky fun, either can be found lifeless on the side of the road. Your family is disappointed and concerned once they find out you've picked one up. Not to mention you try to hide how much money you routinely give one from your significant other.
    - getslideways

  21. #21
    Veteran Member Four Rings BITRBO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 08 2007
    AZ Member #
    16235
    Location
    Mr. Worl-Wye

    Quote Originally Posted by Laszlo@034 View Post
    We actually just tuned a Mk4 Jetta which had a 3.6L bottom end, modified to accept the R32/3.2L TT head. This allows you to keep the existing ME7 harness and ECU that comes with your car.

    Converting to the FSI 3.6L head, direct injection fueling, and ME9 ECU from the Touareg would be a nightmare.

    Here's a dyno of the car, it also had a full exhaust and Techtonics 24V cams:

    As you can see, it makes a ton more power than the 3.2L 24V everywhere.
    Very interesting Laszlo - I'm so glad you chimed in! So my next question would be, do you think this swap would be possible in the TT chassis, or is the engine mounted differently (transversely vs. longitudinally)? And did that MK4 Jetta have AWD, or just FWD?

    Thanks!

    p.s. assuming a 15% DT loss, did your Jetta make about 317hp/307ft-lbs at the crank?
    '13 C63 AMG -
    '14 Tiguan - sold
    '09 JSW - sold
    '04 GTI - sold
    '01 S4 - sold

  22. #22
    Veteran Member Four Rings BITRBO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 08 2007
    AZ Member #
    16235
    Location
    Mr. Worl-Wye

    bump for 034 response
    '13 C63 AMG -
    '14 Tiguan - sold
    '09 JSW - sold
    '04 GTI - sold
    '01 S4 - sold

  23. #23
    Registered Member One Ring
    Join Date
    Mar 11 2010
    AZ Member #
    55901
    My Garage
    M3 E92
    Location
    canada

    TT 3.2T

    Hi Guys,

    It's my first post here...
    My daily driver is a Mk1 3.2 with Turbo!
    I got 330 hp on the dyno.
    Cost of mod: 11K CAD

    Runs great, no trouble with S4 & M3's anymore.
    It's very funny to see the driver's faces when they just can't catch-up!

    :)

    Cheers

    Andre

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  


    © 2001-2025 Audizine, Audizine.com, and Driverzines.com
    Audizine is an independently owned and operated automotive enthusiast community and news website.
    Audi and the Audi logo(s) are copyright/trademark Audi AG. Audizine is not endorsed by or affiliated with Audi AG.