Right. So here's the situation. Wife leaves the car unlocked so I can finish unloading it. The car is parked far away on the street, so when I grab the last load, I can't lock the car because my wife has the keys in the house. I just think this 'feature' seems like it's being a bit too clever. Seriously, if I'm not smart enough to be trusted with manual control of the door locks, I really shouldn't be allowed to drive, period. Calling this a 'feature' is a pretty long stretch, IMO.
I'd accept the japanese compromise of forcing you to hold the handle open when closing the door, but no, the vaunted teutonic engineering has failed me in this one instance. In my 15 years of driving, I've never locked myself out of a car even once, so I think Audi should give me the benefit of the doubt and let me lock the car without a key. Bottom line- I can accept designing the locking feature to make it fool-resistant to prevent lockouts, but removing a feature entirely to protect stupid people does everyone else a disservice. There isn't even a hoop a smart person can jump through to lock the doors on the damn car. Isn't that weird?
Bookmarks